I don't usually write about the use of neuro-weapons used on suspects accused or found guilty of mass shootings because it can be a touchy subject. In the past, I've mentioned two cases where I thought the possibility was plausible. That would be the case of Nikolas Cruz in the Parkland shooting and Stephen Paddock in the Vegas shooting. Yesterday, I was perusing You Tube and a video came up in my feed called "What pretending to be crazy looks like" by the creator JCS - Criminal Psychology. It consisted of footage of the interrogation between Cruz and the Sheriff/Detective. Through-out the video there is a voice over of, I would assume the YouTube creator, analyzing the interrogation. As of May 26, when the video went up, it has since garnered over 15 million views. Because this is a serious matter, I have my own thoughts of the video.
Let me first state that what happened in the Parkland shooting was a terrible tragedy and I am not making excuses for what Cruz did. I am only offering possibilities of some the forces that might have been used on Cruz without his knowledge or awareness. These same forces might also not be known to the detective doing the interrogation, the You Tube creator, or the 15 million people that viewed the video. I have stated many times that when a suspect is taken into custody after these mass shootings and they speak of voices in their head, it should be taken seriously. A lot of times the suspect is killed in the event (as with Paddock) and we never get a chance to interrogate the person. I believe that the criminals that use neuro-weapons on these shooters prefer that the shooters die in the event and are unable to talk about their experiences concerning these forces like "voices and demons" as with Cruz.
IF, Cruz was being targeted with neuro-weapons, I believe it would have been more than just (voice to skull) technology. I believe the criminals with this technology would have used the whole arsenal that they have. To pull off a crime like this would require more than just that effect. They would have used isolation techniques, dream/REM hacking, sleep harassment/deprivation, emotional manipulation, systems of reward and punishment using physical pain, subliminal suggestion (music), mind melding, personality overlays/split, manipulation of memory, information related to his family (mother/father), street theater, his psychological profile and belief systems, and host of other phenomena that can be learned about in Robert Duncan's book Project Soul Catcher vol 2 and bunch of other books over at the SERE's Catalog (another blog I have). Also check out the blog post (NSA Mind Control and Psyops)which has a copyright of 1999, putting just the paper itself 19 years before this event. Obviously that means the technology and techniques are even older.
After I am done critiquing and analyzing the video, I want to discuss what can be done to prevent events like this from ever happening again, especially if neuro-weapons were used on Cruz.
Basically, my critique of this video and the people in it, will be a set of Red Flags that leads me to believe the possibility that Cruz was a TI for this crime. To be fair, this is the only video from this creator that I have seen, so I can't speak to much about the channel. I understand what the You Tuber is trying to convey by labeling the title, "What pretending to be crazy looks like". I do think Cruz is pretending to be crazy out of fear and confusion but I think those antics can be spliced and separated from the effects of neuro-weapons. I also understand that both the interrogator and the You Tuber may have never even heard of these technologies and are operating off that basis. This was a terrible incident and I can understand where they might be coming from, but I did find both people to be a little arrogant and condescending. As I watched the video, it felt like the You Tuber just got a degree in criminal psychology and now thinks he knows everything because he finds Cruz pretending to be crazy. I also was annoyed with the interrogator who kept trying to be cute with Cruz by making fun of his antics, especially the part where he discusses Cruz's "demons and voices". I just felt like he was a little unprofessional. He knows that he too is on camera and wanted to be cute for the boys all watching the interrogation behind the camera. Maybe he thought he would get a few laughs from the guys. Or maybe he thought he would get a few needles in Cruz himself by being sarcastic and condescending or playing the role. If I was an obese, balding, middle aged detective, the last thing I would be doing is trying to be cute on camera. Neither of these behaviors help bring about public awareness about these technologies and their applications or role in society. In fact, they do the opposite, by giving cover to the criminals using these weapons. That's why I am spending time writing this on my Memorial Day weekend. I'm not writing it for fun that's for sure. http://higherorderthinking23.blogspot.com
Now on to the analysis:
RED FLAG 1.
One of the first things that jumped out at me while watching this video and the interrogation was when the You Tuber cuts from the interrogation and goes to footage of Cruz on the ground with police right after being caught. One of the first things he says and repeats is "Demons and Voices" and 'What happened". This where the criminal psychologist YouTuber and I have differences of opinion. He thinks this is where Cruz starts his "stratagem" for his own interrogation. Now, it is possible that he made this up on the spot or had thought about what to do if he got caught but I feel as if he truly experienced those things and was now confused as to what happened and why he was not hearing them now. Two of the effects that could have been used on him with these weapons during the incident is the use of (voice to skull) and the (mind meld). I have experienced both of these effects once in my life. Voice to skull technologies make the target actually hear a voice that sounds external (it's not a head voice). It's computer generated and specific to the target so that only that person can hear it, no one around Cruz would be able to hear it. When it happened to me in 2004, I was walking to class on campus and out of no where I heard my first and last name come from what seemed the top of my head, there was no one around and that was all that was transmitted. I'm not sure the reason why it was used on me other then to maybe hope it scared me or impressed me or to just see what I might attribute it to, basically my reaction. I remember responding by saying out loud, "that was cute". For context: At this point in time (2004) I had already been suspicious and aware of the physical surveillance that was taking place against me, was aware of the sniper event that took place against me at my first residence, was questioning the events of 9/11, and was starting to look into a paper I found at the time called (Remote Neural Monitoring).
Work in progress !!!!!