Synthetic Telepathy and The Early Mind Wars

SYNTHETIC TELEPATHY
AND
THE EARLY MIND WARS
Richard Alan Miller, c2001
drram@magick.net
www.nwbotanicals.org
[Presented at the Consciousness Technologies Conference, July 19-21, 2001, on Saturday, July 20th, 2001, in
Sisters, OR http://www.bluehoney.org/CT2001Gallery.htm]
Introduction:
I first became aware of Allan Frey's work at Willow Grove in 1972, just after completing "The
Holographic Concept of Reality." I was working with Dr. Carl Scheicher (MRU) at the time,
and was asked about the significance of this work. Realizing its possible use in mind control, my
first reaction was to go on "red alert."
Full significance was not yet understood at this time. Basically, Frey had discovered another
sensory motor input in the higher blue-band frequencies of 0.3-3.0 GHz. - at very low amplitudes
of power. It was "as if" we had another type of "vision," but did not know how to "see" what
was being received. It constituted the next generation of subliminal communications.
My work at the time was involved with an AI database for paranormal references (Project
Parafile). A second paper was also presented at the Omniversal Symposium, California State
College at Sonoma, (September 29, 1973). This was titled "Embryonic Holography," and was an
application of the "Holographic Concept of Reality" model. It dealt with biogenesis and
neurological regeneration, and included speculation on the origins of cancer, faith healing,
psychic surgery and more technical aspects of mind-body energetics.
One week after the delivery of that paper, four men came into my place of business, two in suits
and two in full Army dress. The two suits held me under close arrest, while the two Army
personnel went through my files, pulling anything related to "Embryonic Holography." The
paper was rewritten from old notes and memory, but it was not the same.
What got this paper classified "top secret" for almost 20 years was that it was critical for the use
of Allan Frey's study, and its possible application to mind control. I never was able to draw what
was so important in that initial paper until I began researching this paper, more than 24 years
later. I will discuss those aspects further into this document.
In 1961, Allen Frey, a freelance biophysicist and engineering psychologist, reported that humans
could hear microwaves. Most United States scientists dismissed this discovery as the result of
outside noise.
James C. Linn offered a more technical description of the experiment.
"Frey found that human subjects exposed to 1310 MHz and 2982 MHz
microwaves at average power densities of 0.4 to 2 mW/cm2 perceived auditory
sensations described as buzzing or knocking sounds. The sensation occurred
instantaneously at average incident power densities well below that necessary for
known biological damage and appeared to originate from within or near the back
of the head."
Pulsed Microwave Technology
Pulsed microwave voice-to-skull (or other-sound-to-skull) transmission was discovered during
World War II by radar technicians who found they could hear the buzz of the train of pulses
being transmitted by radar equipment they were working on. This phenomenon has been studied
extensively by Dr. Allan Frey, (Willow Grove, 1965) whose work has been published in a
number of reference books.
What Dr. Frey found was that single pulses of microwave could be heard by some people as
"pops" or "clicks", while a train of uniform pulses could be heard as a buzz, without benefit of
any type of receiver.
Dr. Frey also found that a wide range of frequencies, as low as 125 MHz (well below
microwave) worked for some combination of pulse power and pulse width. Detailed unclassified
studies mapped out those frequencies and pulse characteristics which are optimum for generation
of "microwave hearing".
Very significantly, when discussing electronic mind control, is the fact that the peak pulse power
required is modest - something like 0.3 watts per square centimeter of skull surface, and that this
power level is only applied or needed for a very small percentage of each pulse's cycle time. 0.3-
watts/sq cm is about what you get under a 250-watt heat lamp at a distance of one meter. It is
not a lot of power.
When you take into account that the pulse train is off (no signal) for most of each cycle, the
average power is so low as to be nearly undetectable. This is the concept of "spike" waves used
in radar and other military forms of communication.
Frequencies that act as voice-to-skull carriers are not single frequencies, as, for example TV or
cell phone channels. Each sensitive frequency is actually a range or "band" of frequencies. A
technology used to reduce both interference and detection is called "spread spectrum". Spread
spectrum signals usually have the carrier frequency "hop" around within a specified band.
Unless a receiver "knows" this hop schedule in advance, like other forms of encryption there is
virtually no chance of receiving or detecting a coherent readable signal. Spectrum analyzers,
used for detection, are receivers with a screen. A spread spectrum signal received on a spectrum
analyzer appears as just more "static" or noise.
The actual method of the first successful unclassified voice to skull experiment was in 1974, by
Dr. Joseph C. Sharp and Mark Grove, then at the Walter Reed Army Institute of Research. A
Frey-type audible pulse was transmitted every time the voice waveform passed down through the
zero axes, a technique easily duplicated by ham radio operators who build their own equipment.
The sensation is reported as a buzzing, clicking, or hissing which seems to originate within or
just behind the head. The phenomenon occurs with carrier densities as low as microwatts per
square centimeter with carrier frequencies from 0.3-3.0 GHz. By proper choice of pulse
characteristics, intelligent speech may be created.
Dr. James Lin of Wayne State University has written a book entitled: Microwave Auditory
Effects and Applications. It explores the possible mechanisms for the phenomenon, and
discusses possibilities for the deaf, as persons with certain types of hearing loss can still hear
pulsed microwaves (as tones or clicks and buzzes, if words aren't modulated on). Lin mentions
the Sharp and Grove experiment and comments: "The capability of communicating directly with
humans by pulsed microwaves is obviously not limited to the field of therapeutic medicine."
"Synthetic Telepathy"
In 1975, researcher A. W. Guy stated that "one of the most widely observed and accepted
biologic effects of low average power electromagnetic energy is the auditory sensation evoked in
man when exposed to pulsed microwaves."
He concluded that at frequencies where the auditory effect can be easily detected, microwaves
penetrate deep into the tissues of the head, causing rapid thermal expansion (at the microscopic
level only) that produces strains in the brain tissue.
An acoustic stress wave is then conducted through the skull to the cochlea, and from there, it
proceeds in the same manner as in conventional hearing. It is obvious that receiver-less radio
has not been adequately publicized or explained because of national security concerns.
Today, the ability to remotely transmit microwave voices inside a target's head is known inside
the Pentagon as "Synthetic Telepathy." According to Dr. Robert Becker, "Synthetic Telepathy
has applications in covert operations designed to drive a target crazy with voices or deliver
undetected instructions to a programmed assassin."
This technology may have contributed to the deaths of 25 defense scientists variously employed
by Marconi Underwater and Defense Systems, Easems and GEC. Most of the scientists worked
on highly sensitive electronic warfare programs for NATO, including the Strategic Defense
Initiative. It is claimed that directed energy weapons might have been used to literally drive
these men to suicide and 291accidents.
Biological Amplification
Using Microwave Band Frequencies
The next major development in ELF weaponry was the concept of a biological amplification of
these signals at the cell level to perpetuate and set up resonance for more sophisticated
information transfer. This was the beginning of using more than one technology in a stack to do
something "more." While this was implied, it was never developed in "The Holographic
Concept of Reality."
Electromagnetic fields or relatively weak power levels can affect intercellular communication.
Bio-amplification is apparently why radio signals of very low average power (mw) can produce
audio effects, and is difficult to detect. [Electromagnetic Interaction with Biological Systems,
ed. Dr. James C. Lin, Univ. of Illinois, 1989, Plenum Press, NY]
Imposed weak low frequency fields (and radio frequency fields) that are many orders of
magnitude weaker in the pericellular fluid (fluid between adjacent cells) than the membrane
potential gradient (voltage across the membrane) can modulate the action of hormones, antibody
neurotransmitters and cancer-promoting molecules at their cell surface receptor sites.
These ELF sensitivities appear to involve nonequilibrium and highly cooperative processes that
mediate a major amplification of initial weak triggers associated with the binding of these
molecules (specific cell surface receptor sites). Membrane amplification is inherent in this transmembrane
signaling sequence.
Initial stimuli associated with weak perpendicular EM fields and with binding of stimulating
molecules at their membrane receptor sites elicit a highly cooperative modification of Ca++
binding to glycoproteins along the membrane.
A longitudinal spread is consistent with the direction of extracellular current flow associated
with physiological activity and imposed EM fields. This cooperative modification of surface
Ca++ binding is an amplifying stage. By imposing RF fields, there is a far greater increase in
Ca++ efflux than is accounted for in the events of receptor-ligand binding. from imposing RF
fields.
Enzymes are protein molecules that function as catalysts, initiating and enhancing chemical
reactions that would not otherwise occur at tissue temperatures. This ability resides in the
pattern of electrical charges on the molecular surface.
Activation of these enzymes and the reactions in which they participate involve energies millions
of times greater than in the cell surface, triggering events initiated by the EM fields, emphasizing
the membrane amplification inherent in this trans-membrane signaling sequence.
Frey and Messenger confirmed that a microwave pulse with a slow rise time was ineffectual in
producing an auditory response. Only if the rise time is short, resulting in effect in a square wave
with respect to the leading edge of the envelope of radiated radio-frequency energy, does the
auditory response occur. This is why we don't "hear" ordinary radio and TV signals.
The significance of "Embryonic Holography" now becomes more understandable. For example,
the specific frequency bands (0.3-3.0 Hz) are so flat as to appear almost 2-dimensional to most
biological processes on a semi-quantum mechanical level. This means that these frequencies can
be seen as "scalar" in their possible interaction with specific brain processes.
What these frequencies really are, however, are actual holograms of specific thoughts. They
have a third component of detail (much like the patented P300 wave). This means that a hybrid
form of brain fingerprinting is now possible. And, once these "images" are stored (usually in a
very sophisticated super-cooled computer), similar responses can be fed back to the person,
inducing virtually any state desired (via entrainment protocols).
Silent Sound Technology - "S-quad"
Silent (converted-to-voice FM) hypnosis can be transmitted using a voice frequency modulator
to generate the "voice." It is a steady tone, near the high end of hearing range (15,000 Hz), plus
a hypnotist's voice, varying from 300 - 4,000 Hz. These two signals are frequency modulated.
The output now appears as a steady tone, like tinnitus, but with hypnosis embedded. The FMvoice
controls the timing of the transmitter's pulse.
Each vertical line is one short pulse of microwave signal at a frequency to which the human
brain is sensitive. Timing of each microwave pulse is controlled by each down-slope crossing of
the voice wave (Sharp's method, 1974). Then the brain converts the train of microwave pulses
back to inaudible voice. There is no conscious defense possible against this form of hypnosis.
Ordinary radio and TV signals use a smooth waveform called a 'sine' wave. This wave signal
cannot normally penetrate the voltage gradient across the nerve cell walls. Radar signals consist
of very short and powerful pulses of sine wave type signals, and can penetrate the steep voltage
gradient across these nerve cell walls (Allan H. Frey, Cornell University, 1962).
Differences in osmosis of ions (dissolved salt components) cause a small voltage difference
across cell walls. When a small voltage appears across a very tiny distance, the change in
voltage is called very 'steep.' It is this steep gradient that keeps normal radio signals from
throwing us into convulsions.
The mind-altering mechanism is based on a subliminal carrier technology: the Silent Sound
Spread Spectrum (SSSS), sometimes called "S-quad" or "Squad". It was developed by Dr Oliver
Lowery of Norcross, Georgia, and is described in US Patent #5,159,703, "Silent Subliminal
Presentation System", dated October 27, 1992. The abstract for the patent reads:
"A silent communications system in which nonaural carriers, in the very low or
very high audio-frequency range or in the adjacent ultrasonic frequency spectrum
are amplitude- or frequency-modulated with the desired intelligence and
propagated acoustically or vibrationally, for inducement into the brain, typically
through the use of loudspeakers, earphones, or piezoelectric transducers. The
modulated carriers may be transmitted directly in real time or may be
conveniently recorded and stored on mechanical, magnetic, or optical media for
delayed or repeated transmission to the listener."
According to literature by Silent Sounds, Inc., it is now possible, using supercomputers, to
analyze human emotional EEG patterns and replicate them, then store these "emotion signature
clusters" on another computer and, at will, "silently induce and change the emotional state in a
human being".
Edward Tilton, President of Silent Sounds, Inc., says this about S-quad in a letter dated
December 13, 1996:
"All schematics, however, have been classified by the US Government and we are
not allowed to reveal the exact details... ... we make tapes and CDs for the
German Government, even the former Soviet Union countries! All with the
permission of the US State Department, of course... The system was used
throughout Operation Desert Storm (Iraq) quite successfully."
"Induced Alpha to Theta Biofeedback Cluster Movement" is an output from "the world's most
versatile and most sensitive electroencephalograph (EEG) machine". This device has a gain
capability of 200,000, as compared to most other EEG machines (with gain capability of 50,000).
It is software-driven by the "fastest of computers" using a noise nulling technology similar to
that used by nuclear submarines for detecting small objects underwater at extreme range.
The purpose of all this high technology is to plot and display a moving cluster of periodic
brainwave signals. The illustration shows an EEG display from a single individual, taken of left
and right hemispheres simultaneously. This technology is very similar to that used to generate
P300 waves.
Cloning the Emotions
By using these computer-enhanced EEGs, scientists can identify and isolate the brain's lowamplitude
"emotion signature clusters," synthesize them and store them on another computer. In
other words, by studying the subtle characteristic brainwave patterns that occur when a subject
experiences a particular emotion, scientists have been able to identify the concomitant brainwave
pattern and can now duplicate it.
"These clusters are then placed on the Silent Sound[TM] carrier frequencies and
will silently trigger the occurrence of the same basic emotion in another human
being!"
Regarding system delivery and applications, there is a lot more involved here than a simple
subliminal sound system. There are numerous patented technologies that can be piggybacked
individually or collectively onto a carrier frequency to elicit all kinds of effects.
There appear to be two methods of delivery with the system. One is direct microwave induction
into the brain of the subject, limited to short-range operations. The other, as described above,
utilizes ordinary radio and television carrier frequencies.
Far from necessarily being used as a weapon against a person, the system does have limitless
positive applications. However, the fact that the sounds are subliminal makes them virtually
undetectable and possibly dangerous to the general public.
In more conventional use, the Silent Sounds Subliminal System might utilize voice commands,
e.g., as an adjunct to security systems. Beneath the musical broadcast that you hear in stores and
shopping malls may be a hidden message that exhorts against shoplifting. And while voice
commands alone are powerful, when the subliminal presentation system carries cloned emotional
signatures, the result is overwhelming.
Free-market uses for this technology are the common self-help tapes, positive affirmation,
relaxation and meditation tapes, as well as methods to increase learning capabilities. But there is
strong evidence that this technology is being developed toward global mind control.
The secrecy involved in the development of the electromagnetic mind-altering technology
reflects the tremendous power that is inherent in it. To put it bluntly, whoever controls this
technology can control the minds of men - all men.
There is evidence that the U.S. Government has plans to extend the range of this technology to
envelop all peoples, all countries. This can be accomplished, and is being accomplished, by
utilizing the nearly completed HAARP project for overseas areas and the GWEN network now in
place in the U.S. The U.S. Government denies all this.
Dr Michael Persinger is a Professor of Psychology and Neuroscience at Laurentian University,
Ontario, Canada. His work and findings indicate that strong electromagnetic fields can and will
affect a person's brain.
"Temporal lobe stimulation can evoke the feeling of a presence, disorientation,
and perceptual irregularities. It can activate images stored in the subject's
memory, including nightmares and monsters that are normally suppressed."
Mind Reading Devices
Alan Yu, a former lieutenant colonel in the Taiwan National Defense Department, says that the
United States has not only developed an operational mind control machine, but has also
distributed models for use by allied countries. Yu states that such machines pose a great threat to
human rights and the American way of life. He calls the device the "Mind Reading Machine"
(Mind Machine).
Yu writes that there are two sources of information detailing the existence of the Mind Reading
Machine. The first evidence: In the 1970s, The South China Morning Post reported that the
University of Maryland had invented a Thought Reading Machine. The original purpose of this
invention was to help authorities investigate severe car accidents. It was to be used on people
who were severely injured to get their accounts of how the accidents occurred.
In the spring of 1984, Yu was a lieutenant colonel serving in the National Defense Department of
Taiwan. At that time, Yu read a classified document from the department that he serviced under.
The document said the Military Police Department of Taiwan had purchased several of the Mind
Reading Machines from the United States (In Taiwan, it was called Psychological Language
Machine).
The document was a request to the United States for parts to repair several malfunctioning
machines. The machine allegedly uses microwaves to deliver spoken messages directly to the
human brain, as well as using radio waves to hypnotize people or change their thoughts. Yu
reports that before he left, this machine had become the most effective weapon for the security
departments of Taiwan.
In 1993, Defense News announced that the Russian government was discussing with American
counterparts the transfer of technical information and equipment known as "Acoustic Psychocorrection."
The Russians claimed that this device involves the transmission of specific
commands via static or white noise bands into the human subconscious without upsetting other
intellectual functions.
Demonstrations of this equipment have shown encouraging results after exposure of less than
one minute and have produced the ability to alter behavior on unwilling subjects. A US
Department of Defense medical engineer claimed in 1989 that the U.S. and Israel had regularly
used microwaves to condition and control the minds of Palestinians.
Unclassified ELF-Type Weapons
Remote physical manipulation: Not covered in this document. At time of writing, that
technology appears to be classified.
Transmission methods for neuro-effective signals: This includes pulsed microwave
(i.e., like radar signals) and ultrasound and voice-FM (transmitted through the air). Also known
as "Synthetic Telepathy."
While transmission of speech, dating from the early 1970s, was the first use of pulsed
microwave, neuro-effective signals can now cause many other nerve groups to become remotely
actuated. That specific technology is classified.
Pavlovian hypnotic triggers: A [Pavlovian] hypnotic trigger is a phrase or any sensory
cue that the subject is programmed to involuntarily act in a certain way. MKULTRA survivors
can still be triggered from programming done decades ago.
One of the main goals of the institutional/drug/child abuse phases of the CIA MKULTRA
atrocities (1950's through 1970's) was to implant triggers using a "twilight state" (half-conscious)
medication and tape-recorded hypnosis. The ultimate goal was to have the acting out of
Pavlovian triggers erased from the victim's memory.
These triggers are now planted using either of the above two transmission methods, but with the
words moved up just above (or near the top of) the audible frequency range. The result is that
hypnotic triggers are planted without the subject being aware. This technology was used in the
Gulf War as "Silent Sound."
Through-wall surveillance methods: This includes top end of microwave (near
infrared), and the so-called "millimeter wave" scanning. This method uses the very top end of
the microwave radio signal spectrum just below infrared. To view small objects or people
clearly, the highest frequency that will penetrate non-conductive or poorly-conductive walls is
used.
Millimeter wave scanning radar can be used in two modes: The first is passive (no radiated
signal) and uses background radiation already in the area to be scanned. It is totally
undetectable. The active system uses a (low power millimeter wave) "flashlight" attached to the
scanner.
Thought reading: Thought reading can be classed as a form of "through wall
surveillance" technology. In the unclassified and commercial realms, it is called thru-skull
microwave reading, and magnetic skull-proximity reading.
Brain entrainment: This involves moods and sleep states, the reverse of biofeedback.
The low frequency electrical brain rhythms are characteristics of various moods and states of
sleep. Not only can they now be read out using biofeedback equipment or EEG machines, but
also radio, sound, contact electrodes, or flashing lights. These moods and sleep states can be
generated or at least encouraged using brain entrainment devices.
Brain entrainment signals cannot carry voice, which is a much higher frequency range. Brain
entrainment can, however, be used to "set up" a target to make him/her more susceptible to
hypnosis.
Implantation: (no longer required)
Specific ELF Weapons
Ultrasound and Voice-FM: Main advantage in mind control work is that it can carry
verbal hypnosis, more potent than simple biorhythm entrainment. An example is Chicago's
Airport Terminal connection tunnels and their "Keep Walking."
Steady tone, near the high end of hearing range (15,000 Hz). Hypnotist's voice, varying from
300 to 4,000 Hz, fed into a frequency modulator, where the voice controls the frequency. Output
is now a steady tone, sounding like tinnitus, but with hypnosis embedded. While the brain can
hear and understand, the ear only hears a "tone" or a "rush."
Acoustic Heterodyne
American Technologies Corp.
13114 Evening Creek Drive. S.
San Diego, CA 92128
Through-Wall Radar: Millimeter wave through clothing, through-luggage is currently
in use at airports. Millimeter wave scanners can be purchased from:
Millivision Corp.
Northampton, MA
www.millivision.com
Thought Readings: Thought reading is an enhanced version of computer speech
recognition, with EEG waves being substituted for sound waves. The easiest "thought" reading
is actually remote picking up of the electro-magnetic activity of the speech-control muscles.
When we say words to ourselves, silently, or, read a book, we can actually feel the slight
sensations of those words in our vocal muscles - all that is absent is the passage of air.
Coordinated speech signals are relatively strong and relatively consistent.
We are "fed" hypnotic signals to force consistent "neutral" content (but of different character
than prior to becoming test subjects) in dreams. These forced, neutral content ("bland" content)
dreams occur every single night and may represent the experimenters' efforts to have our
experiences portray themselves in such dreams, in effect, mining our experiences.
www.raven1.net/elecvisn.htm confirms the ability of current unclassified technology to actually
see what a living animal sees, electronically. It is therefore extremely likely that these forced
dreams can be displayed on the experimenters' screens in an adjacent apartment or adjacent
house, (which are made obvious to the involuntary experimentee).
Implants: Implants can either receive instructions via radio signals, passing them to the
brain. Or, can be interrogated via external radio signals to read brain activity at a distance.
Since implants for beneficial purposes are actively being promoted by NIH, it is obvious they
will not disappear any time soon.
Thermal Gun, Seizure Gun, and Magnetophosphene Gun: Evokes a visual response
and is thought to be centered in the retina (as seen in the movies Goldeneye, Broken Arrow,
Escape From LA, and Eraser). The popular video "Waco: The Big Lie Continues" shows video
footage of three EM weapons being used during the confrontation.
Silent Subliminals
ALTERED STATES LTD
P.O.Box 68-344, Newton,
Auckland, New Zealand.
Ph: +64-9-815-5095 or +64-9-815-5059
Fax: +64-9-815-5067
altered@ihug.co.nz
www.altered-states.co.nz/cgi-bin/reload.cgi?^/sub/silent.htm
From their brochure:
"Only your mind can hear. Your ears hear nothing but your mind hears and
accepts the powerful suggestions.
You can safely play these tapes anywhere - in a car, while watching TV or
listening to your favorite music, while working or even as silent sleep
programming.
Warning: Everyone within listening range of the tape will be
programmed by the suggestions. To assure yourself that strong suggestions are
recorded on the tape, take it to any Radio Shack store, play it on their stereo and
read the output with a Radio Shack Sound Level Meter (Item 33-2050)
How To Use The Tapes: Increase the volume until it is just below any
tape noise. If your stereo deck has treble and bass controls, you can boost the
subliminal output by increasing the treble and decreasing the bass. The player
then emits a strong but inaudible frequency - modulated 60 - 90 decibel signal
that is received and demodulated by the human ear.
Technical Information The Suggestions are delivered on a carrier
frequency of 14,800 cps, via a low-distortion sine wave signal. This frequency is
slightly above the audible hearing range but the frequency-modulated (FM)
signal is still strongly impinging upon the diaphragm of the ear. The listener can
expect his subconscious mind to accept the suggestions with repeated listening.
How To Use The Tapes: Increase the volume until it is just below any
tape noise. If your stereo deck has treble and bass controls, you can boost the
subliminal output by increasing the treble and decreasing the bass. The player
then emits a STRONG BUT INAUDIBLE frequency-modulated 60 to 90 decibel
signal that is received and demodulated by the human ear.
The Silent Subliminals is a new brain/mind technology developed by an
aerospace engineer. This new technique has been licensed to Valley of the Sun
Audio/Video for this incredible new tape series. Patent pending. Note: Because
the frequency is beyond normal recording range, the tape cannot be duplicated:
Examples of Suggestions:
- "Every day you become thinner and thinner"
- "You now lose weight and full fill your goals"
- "You attain your weight goals and the body you desire"
- "You have the power and ability to attain the perfect weight
and body you desire"
- "You have the self-discipline to lose all the weight you
want"
- "You live a healthy lifestyle and eat a proper diet"
- "You now quit smoking because it serves you"
- "You lose all desire to smoke"
- "You accept that you now quit smoking"
- "You are a non-smoker"
- "Quit smoking. Quit smoking. Quit smoking"
- "You have the willpower to do anything you want to do"
- "You have great self- discipline and you use it to quit
smoking"
- "Cigarettes disgust you"
- "You are very sure of yourself"
- "You accept that you have great inner courage"
- "You are self-reliant and self-confident"
- "You are full of independence and determination"
- "You have great inner courage"
- "Every day in every way, you become more and more self-confident"
- "You feel good about yourself"
- "You project a very positive self-image"
- "You are relaxed and at ease"
- "You detach from worldly pressures and experience an inner calm"
- "Negativity flows through you without affecting you"
- "You accept other people as they are"
- "You peacefully accept the things you cannot change, and
change the things you can"
- "You are at peace with yourself, the world and everyone in it"
- "Your mind is like calm water
- "You direct your time and energy to manifest your desires"
- "You have the self-discipline to accomplish your personal
and professional goals"
- "Every day, you increase your self-discipline"
- "You do what you need to do and stop doing what doesn't work"
- "You freely choose to do what you need to do"
- "You are assertive and feel good about yourself
- "You now focus your energy upon attaining success"
- "You know exactly what you want and you go for it"
- "You can accomplish whatever you set out to do"
- "Be ultra-successful. Be ultra-successful and become wealthy"
- "Every day in every way, you become more successful"
- "Your creative thinking opens the door to monetaryabundance"
- "You easily achieve and maintain a penile erection"
- "Your body performs perfectly during sex without thinking about it"
- "A hard, firm erection is your natural response to sexual stimulation "
- "You can make love for a long before you ejaculate"
- "Every day you feel better about your sexual prowess and
your ability to achieve and maintain a hard, firm erection"
"Acoustic Spotlight (Can Target One person in Crowd)"
Posted by F. Joseph Pompeii, MIT Media Lab
http://sound.media.mit.edu/~pompei/spotlight/
Usage: The Audio Spotlight can be used in two major ways: As directed
audio, sound is directed at a specific listener or area, to provide a private or area
specific listening space. As projected audio, sound is projected against a distant
object, creating an audio image. This audio image is literally a projected
loudspeaker - sound appears to come directly from the projection, just like light.
The Audio Spotlight consists of a thin, circular transducer array and a specially
designed signal processor and amplifier. The transducer is about half an inch
thick, nonmagnetic, and lightweight. The signal processor and amplifier are
integrated into a unit about the same size as a traditional audio amplifier, and have
similar power requirements.
Technology: Because it is impossible to generate extremely narrow
beams of audible sound without extremely large loudspeaker arrays, we instead
generate the sound indirectly, using the nonlinearity of the air to convert a narrow
beam of ultrasound into a highly directive, audible beam of sound.
The device transmits a narrow beam of ultrasound (blue), which, due to the
inherent nonlinearity of the air itself, distorts (changes shape) very slightly as it
travels. This distortion creates, along with new ultrasonic frequencies, audible
artifacts (green) that can be mathematically predicted, and therefore controlled.
By constructing the proper ultrasonic beam, this nonlinearity can be used to
create, within the beam itself, an audible sound beam containing any sound
desired. This is presently done in real-time using low cost circuitry, a specially
designed amplifier, and transducers developed at MIT specifically for this project.
Hyperdirectivity: The directivity, or narrowness, of an acoustic wave
generated by a circular transducer is proportional to the ratio of the diameter of
the transducer to the wavelength of the sound. So a transducer much larger than
the wavelength of the sound creates a very narrow beam.
Audible sound contains wavelengths reaching lengths of several feet, so a
reasonably sized loudspeaker will always produce a very wide, non-directional
source at lower frequencies. The Audio Spotlight, in contrast, outputs short,
millimeter sized ultrasonic waves, which form a very narrow beam even in a
small transducer, which in turn generates audible sound.
The nature of the nonlinear transformation also essentially eliminates side lobes in
the resulting beam, and maintains relatively uniform directivity across the entire
audible frequency range.
The figure above (from American Technologies Corp.) compares the directivity
of the Audio Spotlight (yellow) to that of an ordinary loudspeaker (purple) at 400
Hz. Note that the directivity of the Audio Spotlight is only three degrees,
compared to the essentially omni directional directivity of the loudspeaker.
In order to obtain such narrow directivity from a traditional loudspeaker system,
one would need a loudspeaker array fifty meters across! A loudspeaker is like a
light bulb, but the Audio Spotlight is like a laser.
History: The use of nonlinear interaction of high frequency sound to
generate directive low frequency sound sources has been a well-researched
subject in the field of underwater acoustics since the early 1960's. Often
misattributed to so-called "Tartini Tones," the effect is more accurately described
as a parametric array, a term introduced by Westervelt.
In the past several decades, many underwater sonar researchers have used the
effect to generate directive low frequency sonar beams, detect underwater sound
(parametric receiving array), and extend the bandwidth of underwater transducers.
The first published demonstration of an airborne parametric array was in 1975 by
Bennett and Blackstock. Rather than using inaudible ultrasound, they instead used
very intense, high frequency audible sound to produce simple difference tones.
While their goal was not a practical audio reproduction device, they nonetheless
effectively demonstrated that the parametric array would work in air in addition to
underwater.
Life Assessment Detector System (LADS) The Life Assessment Detector System
(LADS), a microwave Doppler movement measuring device, can detect human body surface
motion, including heartbeat and respiration, at ranges up to 135 feet (41.15 meters).
The primary function of the LADS is to provide a reliable method by which medical and
emergency personnel can locate personnel buried in building collapses or injured on the military
battlefield. LADS can detect such signs of life as movement, heartbeat, or respiration.
Originally designed to detect heartbeat and respiration of military personnel wearing chemicalbiological
warfare protective overgarments, the LADS has been restructured, greatly increasing
its operational range and providing a means for eliminating "nuisance alarms" which could
mimic human life signs, such as fans, wind drafts, or swaying trees.
This is accomplished through neural network technology, which "trains" the system to recognize
human motion and heartbeat/respiration functions. If these functions are not detected, the
reasonable assumption is that there are no survivors. Operating under such an assumption, the
rescue team can now proceed without fear of further loss of life, i.e., rescue and medical
personnel and equipment can be deployed more effectively and efficiently.
The LADS consists of a sensor module, a neural network module, and a control/monitor module.
The sensor module is an x-band (10 GHz) microwave transceiver with a nominal output power
of 15 milliwatts, operating in the continuous wave (CW) mode. The neural network module
device can store many complex patterns such as visual waveforms and speech templates, and can
easily compare input patterns to previously "trained" or stored patterns.
The control/monitor module provides the LADS' instrument controls, such as on-off switches,
circuit breakers, and battery condition, as well as motion, heartbeat waveform, pulse strength,
and pulse rate displays.
LADS provides life assessment capabilities for people who are:
Trapped in building rubble;
Battlefield casualties in a chemical/biological warfare environment;
Victims of airline, train, or automobile crashes;
Trapped in an avalanche or mudslide;
Trapped on a mountain ledge;
Trapped under a collapsed tent structure; or
Hostages being held in a nonmetallic room.
For more information about the LADS, send E-mail to: info@vsecorp.com
Radar Flashlight: The National Institute of Justice (NIJ), through the Joint (Justice-
Defense) Program Steering Group (JPSG), is sponsoring Georgia Tech Research Institute
(GTRI) in developing inexpensive, handheld, low-power radar that will enable law officers to
detect individuals through interior building walls. It works by sensing the motion of an
individual's chest when they breathe.
GTRI is currently designing and refining the first prototype unit. A laboratory test area has been
constructed consisting of a section of home siding and drywall, a wooden front door, and a
section of brick and mortar.
It also demonstrated the ability to detect an individual through the laboratory's cinder block
walls. GTRI is working to combine the two parts of this device into a single unit. NIJ plans on
demonstrating the Radar Flashlight with law enforcement agencies through its National Law
Enforcement and Corrections Technology Center (NLECTC) (Southeast Regional Center) before
the end of 1999.
Dr. Pete Nacci Project Manager
(703) 351-8821
pnacci@darpa.mil
Millivision Radar Millimeter-Wave Camera picks up both metallic and plastic
concealed handguns. Between microwave and infrared lies the millimeter wave band. This littleheralded
portion of the electromagnetic spectrum turns out to be perfect for "remote frisking."
Millitech Corp. has designed a camera to accomplish just that.
The idea calls for measuring the time delay and intensity of millimeter wave energy that radiates
naturally. At millimeter wavelengths, people are good emitters, while metals are very poor.
Dielectric objects, such as plastics, ceramics and powdered drugs, are somewhere in between.
Clothing and building materials, such as wallboard, are virtually transparent.
http://www.millivision.com/
Ground (or Home/Apt. Wall) Penetrating Radar: Patriot Scientific Corporation has
developed radar technologies with a wide range of possible applications.
A pulse generator is used to drive the transmit antenna. The pulse is a positive spike going up to
100V then falling back to ground in one and a half nanoseconds corresponding to a pulse
transmit frequency of 750 MHz.
The return signal is read by the receive antenna. At this point some simple analog processing is
done and the signal is digitized at a resolution of 6 GHz, and sent to a PC. The PC correlates the
data into a conventional waveform, does some processing, and then transmits the data over an
Ethernet cable to a Pentium workstation (not shown).
The Pentium workstation is used to apply different digital filters, combine waveforms, and
display the results. This system can be used to demonstrate detection of small targets buried in
sand, people behind walls, and other targets.
Patriot has used its antenna system to demonstrate detection of objects as small as a coke buried
in sand, through a wall. Even small targets disturb the wavefront of the pulse, producing
reflections and modifying the field in measurable ways.
The key to Patriot's Radar system is its ability to transmit and receive pulses barely longer then
single cycles at the transmit frequency. The first waveform shown here is a pulse generated by an
earlier Patriot Design, based on "off the shelf" antenna technology. The waveform on the bottom
was produced and received by Patriot's current Design.
The current Patriot antenna system produces a pulse at the desired frequency with little leading
or trailing noise. The Patriot antenna system provides many advantages over pulse-based
systems.
Patriot originally developed the impulse radar system to allow time domain processing in
Patriot's GPR systems. Because the impulse is extremely short (3 nanoseconds), the time to
return can be used to gauge the distance traveled by the pulse.
Furthermore, the transmitter and receiver antennas are very directional, eliminating much of the
multipath components of the return signal. The short pulses combined with the directional
transmit and receive to provide us with a number of important advantages:
Very low average power during transmission
Low interference from other transmitters
Transmission invisible to conventional receivers
High bandwidth digital data transmission possible
Difficult detection by other impulse receivers
Interference with other sources and receivers is further reduced by using directional antennas.
The antenna design shown is highly directional.
When penetrating the ground, we wish to eliminate as much of the multipath signal as possible.
The directional antennas reduce the multipath signals detected to those that are relatively inline
with the wave path, and eliminate much of the multipath signal that returns at odd angles.
Impulse radar uses low power inherently because the transmissions occur in pulses separated by
periods of no transmission. The power of the pulses is offset by the dead time between the
pulses. The average output of the current system is about 300 microwatts. The low average
power of an impulse system effectively hides the transmissions from conventional receivers.
Interference can be further reduced in an impulse system by using random interval spacing. As
long as the transmit and receive antennas are in sync, the period between pulses can be varied to
prevent aliening with other continuous- or pulse-transmission systems that might be operating in
the same locale.
Furthermore, if an impulse system is being used to transmit data, varying the intervals between
pulses prevents other impulse systems from locking onto the signal. Patriot Scientifics' current
GPR system does not use random interval spacing.
Patriot Scientific Corporation
http://www.ptsc.com/radar/index.html
Commercial Thought Reading Devices: The Cyberlink Mind Mouse is a revolutionary
hands-free computer controller which allows you to move and click a mouse cursor, play video
games, create music, and control external devices, all without using your hands.
A headband with three sensors detects electrical signals on the forehead resulting from subtle
facial muscle, eye, and brain activity. This headband connects to an interface box that amplifies
and digitizes the forehead signals and sends them to your computer.
The Cyberlink software decodes the forehead signals into ten Brain Fingers for continuous
cursor control. It also decodes eye motion and facial gestures into mouse button clicks,
keystrokes, and cursor resolution control. With a little practice, most or all of these commands
can be mastered to operate virtually all computer functions.
By learning to change the energy levels of your Brain Fingers, you will be able to do just about
anything on a computer, except turn it on! The Cyberlink Mind Mouse supports hands-free
mouse, keyboard and joystick cursor control, switch closure, video game control, and music and
art synthesis.
The Cyberlink Mind Mouse features a Windows 95 Mouse Driver for hands-free control of third
party software like games, business software, Internet browsers, and a range of assistive
technologies, such as the X-10 Home Controller and special needs word-processing and
communication software, including WiVik2, Words Plus, and Clicker Plus.
The Cyberlink Mind Mouse is priced at $1495.00 (U.S.$) plus shipping. Free upgrades are
included for one year.
http://www.mindmouse.com
Hearing For the Deaf: It was during these [Frey] studies that a profoundly important
discovery was made: Deaf subjects often had the ability to hear radio frequency sound. The
clinical criterion was that, if a given person could hear audio above 5 kHz [higher range of a
piano] by bone or air conduction, then radio frequency sound could be heard as well.
This and related work has resulted in the manufacture of radio frequency type hearing aids for
the deaf, one of which is made by Listening, Inc., of Arlington, Mass., and is known as the
Neurophone Model GPF-1. It operates at 100 kHz (about five times the normal maximum
hearing frequency) and employs crystal control.
These observations tie in with the fact that some individuals can detect radio programs through
fillings in their teeth. This phenomenon was technically verified by interposing shields between
respective people who exhibited this effect and the modulated radio frequency sources.
When the lower half of the head was covered, including the maxillary dental area, the radio
frequency sound was perceived. The sound ceased on covering the top half of the head. While
the mechanism responsible for this phenomenon is only imperfectly understood, it can be
assumed to be the result of DIRECT cortical stimulation.
In other words, even when the sound seems to be coming from the teeth, it is actually being
directly received and interpreted in the brain, not the teeth.
Some Important Historical Developments:
Brain-Wave Detection: Some 40-odd years ago, university professor F. Cazzamalli
started publishing papers on the subject of brain-wave detection [using radio signals] and implied
that he had detected radiations from the mind.
He placed his subjects in a shielded room (or Faraday cage), emanated VHF radio waves through
their heads, and claimed to have recorded "beat frequencies" obtained with an untuned receiver
consisting of a galena crystal or diode tube, a fixed capacitor, an antenna, and a sensitive light
beam galvanometer. A "galvanometer" is a voltmeter; light beam types show up in physics labs
and are one of the most sensitive types of voltmeter.
The trouble is that Cazzamalli never mentioned transmitter power in his somewhat
unprofessional papers. His oscillograms meant to show variations of the "beat" when his
subjects were emotionally aroused or engaged in creative tasks when they were in the Faraday
cage. "Beat" as used by Cazzamalli refers to EEG-frequency, i.e., ELF, traces.
Later he told an astounded world that his subjects would hallucinate when under the influence of
his "oscillatori telegrafica," its frequency being around 300 MHz at the time. Aviation radios are
in this range.
Tom Jaski, a noted science writer and engineer duplicated some of Cazzamalli's work with a
modern low-power oscillator that was swept from 300 MHz to 600 MHz. Cell phones start at
over 900 MHz.
His subjects could not see the dial. They were told to sound off as soon as they felt something
unusual. At a certain frequency range - varying between 380 MHz and 500 MHz - the subjects
repeatedly indicated points with exact accuracy in as many as 14 out of 15 trials. At these
"individual" frequencies, the same subjects announced having experienced pulsing sensations in
the brain, ringing in the ears, and an odd desire to bite the experimenters.
The oscillator's output power was only a few milliwatts, while the oscillator itself was located
several feet away from the subjects. Any experimenters out there want to try this? Milliwatts
are quite safe for short-term experiments. Kids' walkie-talkies are 50 to 100 milliwatts, for
example.
LIDA Machine: 1960 Soviet device that bombards brains with low-frequency radio
waves. Now with Dr. Ross Adey, Chief of Research, Veterans Hospital, Loma Linda, CA.
Low frequency square wave modulation of a radio frequency field. It was developed by L.
Rabichev and his colleagues in Soviet Armenia, for "the treatment of neuropsychic and somatic
disorders, such as neuroses, psychoses, insomnia, hypertension, stammering, bronchial asthma,
and asthenic and reactive disturbances." (U.S. Patent # 3,773,049)
The radio frequency field has a nominal carrier frequency of 40 MHz and a maximum output of
approximately 40 watts. The E-field is applied to the patient on the side of neck through two
disc electrodes approximately 10 cm in diameter. The electrodes are located at a distance of 2 to
4 cm from the skin.
The radio signal appears to be the primary cause of the sleep/trance effect. Optimal repetition
frequencies are said to lie in the range from 40 to 80 pulses per minute.
Voice to Skull, 1974: The demonstration of sonic transduction of microwave energy by
materials lacking in water LESSENS the likelihood that a thermo hydraulic principle is operating
in human perception of the energy. Nonetheless, some form of thermo acoustic transduction
probably underlies perception. If so, it is clear that simple heating is NOT a sufficient basis for
the Frey effect; the requirement for pulsing of radiations appears to implicate a thermodynamic
principle.
Frey and Messenger (1973) and Guy, Chou, Lin, and Christensen (1975) confirmed that a
microwave pulse with a slow rise time is ineffective in producing an auditory response; only if
the rise time is SHORT, resulting in effect in a square wave with respect to the leading edge of
the envelope of radiated radio-frequency energy, does the auditory response occur.
Thus the rate of change (the first derivative) of the waveform of the pulse is a CRITICAL factor
in perception. Given a thermodynamic interpretation, it would follow that information can be
encoded in the energy and "communicated" to the "listener".
Communication has in fact been demonstrated. A. Guy, a skilled telegrapher, arranged for his
father, a retired railroad telegrapher, to operate a key, each closure and opening of which resulted
in a pulse of microwave energy. By directing the radiations at his own head, complex messages
via the Continental Morse Code were readily received by Guy.
Sharp and Grove found that appropriate modulation of microwave energy can result in "wireless"
and "receiverless" communication of SPEECH. They recorded by voice on tape each of the
single-syllable words for digits between 1 and 10. The electrical sine-wave analogs of each word
were then processed so that each time a sine wave crossed ZERO REFERENCE IN THE
NEGATIVE DIRECTION, a brief pulse of microwave energy was triggered.
This is, in effect, is a form of what is called pulse-RATE modulation. By radiating themselves
with these "voice modulated" microwaves, Sharp and Grove were READILY able to hear,
identify, and distinguish among the 9 words. Persons with artificial larynxes not unlike those
emitted the sounds heard.
Communication of more complex words and of sentences was not attempted because the
averaged densities of energy required to transmit longer messages would approach the current 10
milliwatts per square centimeter limit of safe exposure.
The capability of communicating directly with a human being by "receiverless radio" has
obvious potentialities both within and without the clinic. But the hotly debated and unresolved
question of how much microwave radiation to which a human being can safely be exposed will
probably forestall applications within the near future.
EC-130E Commando Solo: Primary function is "Psychological operations broadcasts."
Air Force Mission statement: Commando Solo conducts psychological operations and civil
affairs broadcasts missions in the standard AM, FM, HF, TV and military communications
bands.
It was called EC-121, known at the time as the Coronet Solo, and was used in Operation Urgent
Fury. Volant Solo was during Operation Just Cause.
The Commando Solo aircraft and earlier generations of this design have participated in the
following missions:
Operation Urgent Fury (Grenada, October-November 1983, January-June 1985)
Operation Just Cause (Panama, late December 1989)
Operation Desert Shield (Kuwait, Iraq, from August 1990)
Operation Desert Storm (Saudi Arabia, Turkey, Iraq, 1991)
Operation Uphold Democracy (Haiti, 1994-1995)
Operation Joint Guard (Part of a U.N. operation in Bosnia-Herzegovina, 1995)
Operation Desert Thunder (part of a U.N. operation in Iraq)
Operation Desert Fox (Iraq, 2 to 3 days in December 1998)
HAARP:
HAARP (High Frequency Active Auroral Research Project), by virtue of its far-reaching impact
on the environment to be a global concern and calls for its legal, ecological and ethical
implications to be examined by an international independent body before any further research
and testing, regrets the repeated refusal of the United States Administration send anyone in
person to give evidence to the public hearing or any subsequent meeting to be held by its
competent committee into the environmental and public risks connected with the HAARP
programmed currently being funded in Alaska...
One of HAARP's potential uses is a communications system. The military officially
acknowledges two communications-related applications:
(1) to replace the existing Extremely Low Frequency (ELF) submarine communications
system now operating in Michigan and Wisconsin;
(2) to provide a way to wipe out communications over an extremely large area, while
keeping the military's own communications system working.
As we have seen, the mind-control subliminal messages are carried on radio-frequency
broadcasts. The HAARP facility could be used to broadcast global mind-control messages, or
such messages could simply be inserted into existing systems.
Dr. Igor Smirnov, of the Institute of Psycho-correction in Moscow, says in regard to this
technology: "It is easily conceivable that some Russian 'Satan', or let's say Iranian [or any other
'Satan'], as long as he owns the appropriate means and finances, can inject himself [intrude] into
every conceivable computer network, into every conceivable radio or television broadcast, with
relative technological ease, even without disconnecting cables.
Recent Media on HAARP
HAARP TRANSMITTER NOW RUNNING AT FULL POWER!!
Can be Easily Heard Around the World on Short-wave Radio.
Has Space War Begun?
-BJNews by Marshall Smith
"As of this morning, Saturday Feb 17, 2001, HAARP began doing testing with
greatly increased FULL power. The transmitter can now be heard all day long
on 3.39 MHz. Very early this morning about 3 AM, HAARP could be heard at its
"old" normal signal strength. About 4 AM the signal changed in both its pulse
timing and inter-pulse spacing. At 4:30 AM the signal strength suddenly
increased tremendously.
"Unlike previous mornings, there was no regular F-layer daytime fade out when
the sun rose here in California about 6:45 AM. I continued to monitor during the
daylight. I have never heard the HAARP signal during the daytime before. The
sun now rises in Gakona Alaska about 10 AM PST. The received signal again
increased from about S5 to S9 at 10:05 AM. With sunlight at both the transmitter
and receiver there is no F-layer skip to bend the powerful signal around the
planet. This means this is an extremely powerful direct ground wave signal. And
I'm only receiving the leakage off the side lobes of the antenna array.
"The full HAARP design power is supposed to be about 350 Megawatts. But that
is only the published spec, not necessarily what is done in practice (as in those
CB'rs running illegal 1KWatt linear amplifiers). There is a planned Air Force
"Star Wars" test with two vehicles, one from California and the other in the south
Pacific, similar to last summer's failed test. The tentative published launch is set
for late March or April. I will monitor HAARP to confirm it is running full power
during the launch, as it was last summer.
"Last summer's "failure" is exactly what a HAARP device is supposed to do;
destroy the electronic controls of a vehicle so the second stage cannot separate
from the booster. A very cheap, simple way to knock down missiles launched
from anywhere on the planet. It also can destroy military satellites in low orbit.
Maybe that's why the Russians and Chinese have been complaining in the last
several weeks about Bush's intention to "build" the star wars system. Maybe
they've been losing some of their "secret hardware." But of course, they won't say
that in public.
"Its now 11 AM PST, on Saturday the 17th, and the signal is blasting in with the
powerful pre-pulse tone around S+20 and the main signal about S9. The signal
varies 3 to 6 db over a series of several pulses. Since this is not due to F-layer
skip fading, I must assume they are slewing the beam of the antenna in various
directions, and thus changing the amount of the side lobes in this direction. This
must be a test of a simulated space warfare game with multiple targets. Rapid
slewing of the antenna in just a matter of a minute or two is not useful for
submarine communication, nor for their stated purpose of doing "ionospheric
research."
"To show the HAARP signal is abnormally large, at this time, the 80-meter band
is silent and WWV at 5 MHz cannot be heard, as would be expected during the
daytime. WWV at 10 MHz is barely heard but does not even register on the S
meter. Tuning back to 3.39 MHz, the S meter jumps off the top of the scale. Even
the extremely powerful Russian “woodpecker” transmitters during the cold war
never did that, and they were aimed along the ground not out into space. I have
no way to estimate how many Gigawatts that represents.
"It may be only coincidence but just several days ago, Russia announced it would
be conducting a massive space war game, including the launch of numerous
missiles, from both ground sites and submarines. Of course this is only a
coincidence. You Think. For more information about HAARP, how the transmitter
works and to hear what the transmitter sounds like, go back to the Brother
Jonathan Gazette front page article about the HAARP facility and how it is used
in space warfare.
"I should point out in 1983 a number of Air Force ER-135 electronic warfare
planes were shot down in the Sea of Japan. They were apparently making a
covert entry into soviet airspace to test the latest Russian technology. What the
Air Force did not know then was the Soviets had developed a stealth fighter so the
135's never saw the Russians coming and all 5 of the US e-warfare planes were
shot down. To cover this "covert" event, the US shot down a 747, a plane similar
to the 135's (or modified Boeing 707's whose parts are very similar to a 747) so if
plane parts are found in the Sea of Japan they are claimed to be the 747. The 747
may, in fact, have played a part in the covert event. This is the supposed
"Russian" shoot down of Korean Airlines Flight 007, on Sept 1, 1983. I remember
the event well, since it is my son's b-day.
"The proof of a covert event with stealth Russian fighters shooting down 5 Air
Force ER- 135's is documented in R.W. Johnson's book, SHOOTDOWN,
published in 1986. The most convincing evidence is the strange fact that 27 US
active duty electronic warfare officers somehow end up on the passenger list
among the dead on the civilian KAL Flight 007 going to Korea. I only point this
out to show how high tech secret warfare between Russia and the US may result
in deaths and the destruction of hardware, and yet is never reported to the public.
"The US did not announce and demonstrate deployment of its own stealth fighters
until the Gulf War in '90-91, seven years later. In 1991, three events occurred,
(1) the US demonstrates stealth fighter-bombers which can travel anywhere in the
world without detection, (2) the announcement of the construction of HAARP
which would neutralize all soviet missiles coming over the pole, and (3) the
collapse of the Soviet Union. To see these as unrelated events is to miss the point
of history.
"At the present time, both the Russian's and Chinese have demonstrated their
ability and inclination to engage in warfare, especially space warfare. It would
thus seem clear the "coincidence" of the massive Russian war games and the
sudden increase in the output of HAARP in a warfare mode, would indicate that
on this Presidents Day Weekend 2001, warfare is actually occurring, not just
games. Just as in 1985, when planes were destroyed and US airmen died, the
story was completely covered up, but it nonetheless had great implications on the
relations between the governments of the world.
"There are, of course, no airmen on the Russian missiles, nor the Chinese and
Russian satellites in orbit. This is the new hi-tech robotic remote control warfare
of outer space. But, the "war games" are real, nonetheless. The massive increase
in the output of HAARP, under the control of the Air Force's Space Vehicles
Command which operates HAARP and has the mission of engaging in space
warfare, would indicate of a lot of expensive space hardware is now biting the
dust. The Russians will claim their exercise was a "success." The Chinese who
have just lost their "eyes in orbit” will say nothing. And the US will claim, as
usual, "What, who me? HAARP hasn't been in operation since October '99." But
you can listen for yourself on any short-wave receiver by tuning to 3.390 MHz.
Good Listening."
http://www.anomalous-images.com
Some Concluding Remarks
The discovery of "Synthetic Telepathy," as an EM way to communicate information directly
onto the brain has changed everything. And, with related discoveries on membrane responses to
specific frequency bands, and their amplification, has led to some very serious questions. Where
are these technologies really leading man?
Certainly not toward a better way of living…. We see little application in their uses in medicine.
In fact, most aspects have remained classified, and are still being used (historically) for military
applications and uses. When you consider our ability to clone emotions, and the possible uses of
HAARP, there is NO QUESTION on the possibility of its use for the complete mind control of
humanity.
We can do it now. We have the theory. We have the technology. Why would it not be done?
And then, by whom? Dr. Robert O. Becker, twice-nominated for the Noble prize for his health
work in bio-electromagnetism, was more explicit in his concern over illicit government activity.
He wrote of "obvious application in covert operations designed to drive a target crazy with
voices."
What is frightening is that words, transmitted via low-density microwaves or radio frequencies,
or by other covert methods, might be used to create influence. For instance, according to a 1984
U.S. House of Representatives report, a large number of stores throughout the country use high
frequency transmitted words (above the range of human hearing) to discourage shoplifting.
Stealing is reduced by as much as 80 percent in some cases.
Given the low power levels required for some of these psycho-physical effects, and the ability to
concentrate certain frequencies of electromagnetic radiation into tight beams, it is worth
considering the possibility that low-orbiting satellites could transmit such signals directly to a
chosen person. Such a capability would have obvious strategic value.
What if some group or organization wanted to conduct terrorist activities that would strike right
into the heart of their intended victims? What better way than to create killers from the most
ordinary of citizens? Worse yet would be to cause children to unexpectedly lash out and murder
those around them.
It is apparent that the technology exists to elicit such behavior using waves of electromagnetic
energy sent directly into the brain.
"ELF" frequencies, as we know now, are not the most invasive weapons-capable frequencies.
Doses of ELF can act as either sedatives or stimulants, entraining the target's EEG as with the
Russian LIDA machine. Weapons that can transmit hypnotic commands silently and
untraceably, over distance and through walls, can cause a far wider spectrum of effects.
In other words, don't assume that "ELF" is the only form of electromagnetic signal which can do
damage. And, if you might wonder what that "buzzing" sound you sense behind you ear might
be? It is HAARP. You can actually hear it when they have it "on."
The obvious next important discussion should be around the changing Shuman Resonance, and
its affects and importance to biological functions and activities. There is no question that the
Shuman Resonance is changing toward the higher frequencies associated with our "conscious
states" of mind… Why is that?
BOOKS
ON
MIND CONTROL
Adey, W. Ross, and Lawrence, Albert F. (eds.): Nonlinear Electrodynamics in Biological
Systems, Plenum Publishing Corp., NY, 1984.
Alexander, John B., Groller, Richard, and Morris, Janet: The Warrior's Edge: Front-line
Strategies for Victory on the Corporate Battlefield, 1990.
Anderson, Larry E. (ed.): Interaction of Biological Systems with Static and ELF Electric and
Magnetic Fields, Dept. of Energy, Washington, DC, 1984.
Aquino, Michael A. (Major), and Valley, Paul E. (Col.): Mindwar: From Psyops to Mindwar:
The Psychology of Victory.
Bamford, James, and Madsen,: The Puzzle Palace: Inside the National Security Agency,
America's Most Secret Intelligence Organization, Penguin Books, NY, 1982.
Baranska, S., and Czerski, P.: Biological Effects of Microwaves, Dowden, Hutchinson, and Ross,
Inc., Stroudsburg, PA, 1976.
Barnothy, M. F.: Biological Effects of Magnetic Fields, Plenum Publishing Corp., NY, Vol. I:
1964, Vol. II, 1969.
Basar, E., Flohr, H., Haken, H., and Mandell, A. (eds.): Synergetics of the Brain, Springer-
Verlag, Berlin, 1983.
Bearden, Thomas E. (Lt. Col.): An Approach to Understanding Psychotronics, (AD-A027866),
Defense Documentation Center, Washington, DC, 1976.
Bearden, Thomas E. (Lt. Col.): Excalibur Briefing, Strawberry Hill Press/Walnut Hill Books,
San Francisco, 1980.
Bearden, Thomas E. (Lt. Col.): Gravitobiology, 1991.
Bearden, Thomas E. (Lt. Col.): The New Tesla Electromagnetics and the Secrets of Electrical
Free Energy, Tesla Book Co., Millbrae, CA, 1983.
Bearden, Thomas E. (Lt. Col.): Solutions to Tesla's Secrets and the Soviet Tesla Weapons, Tesla
Book Co., Millbrae, CA, 1983.
Becker, Robert O., and Selden, Gary: The Body Electric: Electromagnetism and the Foundation
of Life, William Morrow & Co., Inc., NY, 1985.
Becker, Robert O.: Cross Currents: The Perils of Electropolution, The Promise of
Electromedicine, Jeremy P. Tarcher, NY, 1990.
Becker, Robert O., and Marino, Andrew A.: Electromagnetism and Life, SUNY Press, Albany,
NY, 1982.
Becker, Robert O. (ed.): Mechanism of Growth Control, C. C. Thomas Press, Springfield, IL
1982.
Begich, Nick, and Manning, Jeane: Angels Don't Play This HAARP: Advances in Tesla
Technology, Earthpulse Press, Anchorage, AK, 1995. (ISBN: 0-96488-12-0).
Begich, Nick: Towards a New Alchemy: The Millennium Science.
Beir, V.: Health Effects of Exposure to Low Levels of Ionizing Radiation, 1990.
Beischer, D. E., et al.: Exposure of Man to Magnetic Fields Alternating at Extremely Low
Frequency, (AD-7701400, NAMRL 1180) Naval Aerospace Naval Research Laboratory,
Pensacola, FL, 1973.
Bennett, William R.: Health and Low-Frequency Electromagnetic Fields, Yale University Press,
New Haven, CT, 1994.
Biderman, A. D., and Zimmer, H. (eds.): The Manipulation of Human Behavior, John Wiley &
Sons, 1961.
Blank, Martin: Electromagnetic Field Biointeractions and Mechanics, Advances in Chemistry
Series No. 250. American Chemical Society, 1155 Sixteenth St., NW, Washington, DC 20036,
1995 (ISBN: 0-8412-3135-4).
Bowart, Walter: Operation Mind Control, Dell, NY, 1978.
Bowart, Walter H.: Operation Mind Control: How the Cryptocracy will Psychocivilize You, St.
Martin's Press, NY, 1994.
Braid, James: Electro-biological Phenomena Considered Physiologically and Psychologically,
Sutherland & Knox, Edinburgh, 1851 (yes, 1851).
Brodeur, Paul: Currents of Death: Power Lines, Computer Terminals, and the Attempt to Cover
Up Their Threat to Your Health, Simon & Schuster, NY, 1989.
Brodeur, Paul: Secrets: A Writer in the Cold War, Faber & Faber, Boston, 1997 (ISBN: 0-571-
19907-0).
Brodeur, Paul: The Zapping of America: Microwaves, Their Deadly Risk, and the Cover-up, W.
W. Norton & Co., NY, 1977.
Buderi, : The Invention that Changed the World.
Burch, N., and Altschuler, H. L. (eds.): Behavior and Brain Electrical Activity, Plenum
Publishing Corp., NY, 1976.
Burdick, Dorothy: Such Things are Known, Vantage Press, Inc., 1982 (nonfiction, out-of-print).
Burner, Alvin M.: Biological Effects of Microwaves: Future Research Directions, San Francisco
Press, Inc., San Francisco, CA, 1968.
Burr, H.S.: Blueprint for Immortality: The Electric Patterns of Life, Neville Spearman, London,
1972.
Bylinsky, Gene: Mood Control, Charles Schribner's Sons, NY, 1968.
Callahan, Philip S., (Ph.D.): Exploring the Spectrum and Paramagnetism, 19__.
Callahan, Philip S.: The Paramagnetic ELF Forces, 19__.
Calder, Nigel: The Mind of Man.
Cannon, Martin: Mind Control in America.
Cannon, Martin: The Controllers: A New Hypothesis of Alien Abduction, Prevailing Winds,
Santa Barbara, CA, 1989.
Capron, Alexander, M.: Human Experimentation, University Publications of America, Bethesda,
MD, 1986.
Chavkin, Samuel: The Mind Stealers: Psychosurgery and Mind Control, Houghton Mifflin Co.,
Boston, 1978.
Chiabrera, A., Nicolini, C., and Schwan, H. P. (eds.): Interactions Between Electromagnetic
Fields and Cells, NATO Scientific Affairs Division, ASI Series 97A, Plenum Publications Corp.,
NY and London, 1985.
Chokroverty, Sudhansu: Magnetic Stimulation in Clinical Neurophysiology.
Chorover, Stephen L.: From Genesis to Genocide: The Meaning of Human Nature and the
Power of Behavior Control, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1979.
Clark, Hulda: The Cure for All Disease.
Clarke, Arthur C.: July 20, 2019.
Cleary, Stephen, F. (ed.): Biological Effects and Health Implications of Microwave Radiation,
US Dept. HEW, BRH/DBE 70-2, Washington, DC, (June) 1979 (From the Richmond
Symposium, Richmond, VA , Sept. 17-19, 1979).
Cole, K. C.: Sympathetic Vibrations.
Collins, Larry: The Maze: A Novel, Simon & Schuster, Inc., NY, 1989 (fiction).
Colorado Springs Notes, (Nikola Tesla's experiments).
Condon, Richard: The Manchurian Candidate, (fiction).
Constantine, Alex: Psychic Dictatorship in the USA, Feral House, Portland, OR, 1995
(ISBN: 0-922915-28-8: 221 pages).
Constantine, Alex: Virtual Government: CIA Mind Control Operations in America, Feral House,
Venice, CA, 1997.
Copeland, Miles: Without Cloak and Dagger: The Truth About the New Espionage, Simon &
Schuster, NY, 1974.
Corning, W.C., and Balaban, M.: The Mind: Biological Approaches to its Function, 1968.
Corson, William: The Armies of Ignorance, Dial Press, NY, 1977.
Czerski, P., Shore, M. L., et al. (eds.): Biological Effects and Health Hazards of Microwave
Radiation, Polish Medical Pub., Warsaw, POLAND, 1974.
Davis, Albert Roy: The Anatomy of Biomagnetism, Vantage Press, NY, 1982 (ISBN: 533-05046-
4: 107 pages).
Davis, Albert Roy, and Rawls, Walter C., Jr.: The Magnetic Blueprint of Life, Exposition Press,
Hicksville, NY, 1979 (ISBN: 0-682-49215-9: 150 pages) - (good bibliography at end).
Davis, Albert Roy, and Rawls, Walter C., Jr.: The Magnetic Effect, Exposition Press, Hicksville,
NY, 1975.
Davis, Albert Roy, and Rawls, Walter C., Jr.: Magnetism and Its Effects on the Living System,
Exposition Press, Hicksville, NY, 1974.
Dean, (Lt. Col.) David J. (ed.): Low-Intensity Conflict and Modern Technology, Air University
Press, Maxwell Air Force Base, AL, (June) 1986.
DeFelice, L.: Introduction to Membrane Noise, Plenum Publishing Corp., NY, 1981.
De la Warr, G.W., and Baker, D.: Biomagnetism, de la Warr Laboratories, Ltd., Oxford, 1978.
Delgado, Jose M. R.: Physical Control of the Mind: Toward a Psychocivilized Society, Harper &
Row, NY, 1969.
DeVolpi, A., et al.: Born Secret: The H-H-HhhhHHHH-Bomb, the Progressive Case and
National Security, Pergamon Press, 1981.
Dumansky, Y., Serdyuk, A. M., and Los, I. P.: The Effect of Radiofrequency Electromagnetic
Fields on Humans, Kiev.
Ebon, Martin: Psychic Warfare: Threat or Illusion?, McGraw Hill, NY, 1983.
Eccles, J. C.: The Neurophysiological Basis of Mind, Oxford University Press, NY, 1953.
Eden, Jerome: Animal Magnetism and the Life Energy, Exposition Press, Hickville, NY, 1967.
Edelman, G. M.: The Remembered Present: A Biological Theory of Consciousness, Basic Books,
NY, 1989.
Erne, Sergio N., Hahbohm, H.D., and Lubbig, H.: Biomagnetism, Walter De Gruyter & Co.,
Berlin & NY, 1981 (558 pages).
Eyges, Leonard: The Classical Electromagnetic Field, Addison-Wesley Publishing Co., Reading,
MA, 1972 (413 pages).
Ferguson, Marilyn: The Brain Revolution: The Frontiers of Mind Research, Taplinger Publishing
Co., NY, 1973.
Flanagan, G. Patrick: The Neurophone, Pyramid Power, 8th ed., DeVorss & Co., Marina del
Rey, CA, 1980.
Franceschetti, Giorgio, Gandhi, and Grandolpho, M. (eds.): Electromagnetic Biointeraction,
1988.
Frohlich, H. (ed.): Biological Coherence and Response to External Stimuli, Springer-Verlag,
Heidelberg and Berlin, 1988.
Gaylin, Willard M., Meister, Joel S., and Neville, Robert C. (eds.): Operating on the Mind, Basic
Books, 1975.
Galton, Lawrence: MedTech.
Gillmor, Don: I Swear by Apollo: Dr. Ewen Cameron, the CIA, and the Canadian Mind-Control
Experiments, Eden Press, Montreal, 1986.
Glaser, Zorach R., and Moore Julia L.: Cumulative Index to the Bibliography of Reported
Biological Effects and Clinical Symptoms Attributed to Microwave and Radio-Frequency
Radiation Exposure, Julie Moore and Associates, Riverside, CA, 1982.
Gordon, Thomas: Journey into Madness: The True Story of Secret CIA Mind Control and
Medical Abuse, Bantam Books, NY, 1989.
Grandolfo, M., Michealson, S. M., and Rindl, A. (eds.): Biological Effects and Dosimetry of
Nonionizing Radiation, Plenum Publishing Corp., NY, 1983.
Green, Elmer and Alyce: Beyond Biofeedback, 1977.
Greenslade, Shirley: Mind Control, Agape Word, 1994 (ISBN: 1-886799-05-9).
Guzman, Emilio: Mind Control, Institute of Psychology, Inc., 1996 (ISBN: 0-913343-25-0).
Halacy, D. S., Jr.: Cyborg, 1965.
Hassan, Steven: Combatting Cult Mind Control.
Hazzard, D. G. (ed.): Biological Effects and Measurements of Radio Frequency/Microwaves,
Bureau of Radiological Health, HEW Pub. 77-8026, Rockville, MD, 1977.
Heller, John H.: Of Mice, Men, and Molecules, 1963.
Hemming, Leland H.: Architectural Electromagnetic Shielding Handbook: A Design and
Specification Guide, IEEE (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers) Press, NY, 1992.
Hoffman, Michael A.: Secret Societies and Psychological Warfare, Coetur d'Alene, ID, 1989
(127 pages).
Hooper, Judith: The Three Pound Universe.
Hutchings, Edward, Jr.: Frontiers in Science, 1958.
Hutchison, Michael: Mega Brain: New Tools and Techniques for Brain Growth and Mind
Expansion, Ballantine Books, NY, 1986 (ISBN: 0-345-41032-7: 380 pages).
Hutchison, Michael: Mega Brain Power, (ISBN: 1-56282-770-7: 480 pages).
Illinger, K. H. (ed.): Biological Effects of Nonionizing Radiation, American Chemical Society
Symposium Series No. 157, Washington, DC, 1981.
Jacobson, Steven: Mind Control in the United States, Critique Publishers, Santa Rosa, CA, 1985.
John, E. R.: Machinery of the Mind, Birkhauser, Boston, MA, 1990.
John, R.G., and Dunne, B. J.: Margins of Reality: The Role of Consciousness in the Physical
World, Harcourt, Brace, & Jovanovich, NY, 1987.
Johnson, C. C., and Shore, M. L. (eds.): Biological Effects of Electromagnetic Waves, Bureau of
Radiological Health, HEW Pub. 77-8010, Rockville, MD, 1976.
Johnson, George: In the Palaces of Memory.
Kahn, Herman, and Weiner, Anthony: The Year 2000: A Framework for Speculation on the Next
Thirty-three Years, MacMillian Co., NY, 1967.
Keith, Jim: Mind Control/World Control: The Encyclopedia of Mind Control, Adventures
Unlimited Press, Illinois, 1998 (ISBN: 0-932813-45-3).
Key, Wilson Bryan: The Age of Manipulation: The Con in Confidence; The Sin in Sincere,
Henry Holt & Co., NY, 1989.
Kholodov, Y.A.: Effects of Electromagnetic...
Kollberg, E. (ed.): Microwave and Millimeter Wave Mixers, Institute Electrical, 1984 (ISBN: 0-
87942-179-7).
Kong, Jin A., et al.: Theory of Microwave Remote Sensing, (2nd ed.), John Wiley & Sons, NY,
1985.
Lakhovsky, Georges: The Secret of Life: Cosmic Rays and Radiations of Living Beings, Health
Research, Mokelumme Hill, CA, 1970 (Translated from Russian by Mark Clement: 212 pages).
Lakhovsky, Georges: The Secret of Life: Electricity, Radiation, and Your Body, Liberty Lobby,
Washington, DC, 1994.
Lausch, Erwin: Manipulation, Aiden Ellis, 1974.
Lawrence, Lincoln (pseudonym): Were We Controlled? University Books, New Hyde Park, NY,
1967.
Lawrence, Lincoln (pseudonym), with an introduction by Kenn Thomas: Mind Control, Oswald
& JFK: Were We Controlled? Adventures Unlimited Press, Kempton, IL, 1997 (ISBN: 0-
932813-46-1).
Lee, Martin, and Shlain, B.: Acid Dreams: The CIA, LSD, and the Sixties Rebellion, Grover
Press, NY, 1986.
Lee, Martin: The Beast Reawakens.
Leonard, George: The Silent Pulse, Bantam Books, NY, 1981.
Levitt, B. Blake: Electromagnetic Fields, (432 pages).
Lin, James C. (See Michaelson, Sol M., and): Biological Effects and Health Implications of RF
Radiation.
Lin, James C.: Electromagnetic Interaction with Biological Systems, Plenum Publishing Corp.,
NY, 1989.
Lin, James C.: Microwave Auditory Effects and Applications, 1978 (221 pages).
Lipsky, Stephen: Microwave Passive Direction Finding,
Llaurado, J. G., Sances, A., and Battocletti, J.H.: Biologic and Clinical Effects of Low-Frequency
Magnetic and Electric Fields, Charles C. Thomas, Springfield, IL, 19??. (>1988).
London, Perry: Behavior Control, (269 pages).
Mackay, Stuart: Biomedical Telemetry.
Marha, Karel, Musil, Jan, and Tuha, Hana: Electromagnetic Fields and the Life Environment,
San Francisco Press, San Francisco, CA, 1971.
Marino, Andrew A. (ed.): Modern Bioelectricity, Marcel Dekker, NY, 1988.
Marks, John D.: Search for the Manchurian Candidate: The CIA and Mind Control, Times
Books, NY, 1979 (nonfiction).
Maxwell, J. C.: A Treatise on Electricity and Magnetism, Vols. I & II, Dover Publications, NY,
1954.
McRae, Ronald M.: Mind Wars: The True Story of Government Research into the Military
Potential of Psychic Weapons, St. Martin's Press, NY, 1984 (ISBN: 0-312-65231-3).
Michaelson, Sol M., and Lin, James C.: Biological Effects and Health Implications of RF
Radiation.
Mills, James: The Power, Warner Books, Inc., NY, 1990 (fiction).
Mind Control, Hidden Manipulation and Subliminal Learning, Gordon Press, NY, 1991.
Moell, Joseph D.: Transmitter Hunting: Radio Direction Finding Simplified.
Morris, Janet: Medusa.
Newman, Joseph: Energy is Electromagnetic.
Nicolini, C.: Chromatin Structure and Function, Plenum Press, NY, 1979.
Norden, B., and Ramel, C. (eds.): Interaction Mechanisms of Low-Level Electromagnetic Fields
in Living Systems, Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences, Oxford University Press, Inc., NY,
1989.
O'Connor, Mary Ellen, and Lovely, Richard, H. (eds.): Electromagnetic Fields and
Neurobehavioral Function, Alan R. Liss, Inc., NY, 1988.
O'Neill, John J.: Prodigal Genius: The Life of Nikola Tesla, Ives Washburn, Inc., NY, 1944 (326
pages).
Orwell, George: 1984, Harcourt, Brace,& Jovanovich, NY, 1949 (268 pages).
Osepchuk, John M. (ed.): Biological Effects of Electromagnetic Radiation, John Wiley & Sons,
Inc., NY, 1983 (IEEE Order No. PC01594: 593 pages).
Ostrander, Sheila, and Schroeder, Lynn: Super Memory: The Revolution, 1991.
Persinger, Michael A. (ed.): ELF and VLF Electromagnetic Field Effects, Plenum Publishing
Corp., NY, 1974.
Pines, Maya: The Brain Changers: Scientists and the New Mind Control, Harcourt, Brace,
Javonovich, Inc., 1973.
Polk, C., and Postow, E. (eds.): CRC (Chemical Rubber Co.) Handbook of Biological Effects of
Electromagnetic Fields, Chemical Rubber Co. Press, Boca Raton, FL, 1986.
Popp, Fritz-Albert (ed.): Electromagnetic Bioinformation, Urban & Schwartzenberg, Baltimore,
MD, 1979.
Presman, A. S.: Electromagnetic Fields and Life, Plenum Publishing Corp., NY and London,
1970. Translated from Russian by F.L. Sinclair; Edited by Frank A. Brown (336 pages).
Pribram, Karl H.: Brain and Perception: Holonomy and Structure in Figural Processing,
Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ, 1993.
Pribram, Karl H. (ed.): Rethinking Neural Networks: Quantum Fields and Biological Data,
Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah (Hillsdale), NJ, 1993.
Puharic, Andrija: Beyond Telepathy, Anchor Books, Garden City, NY, 1973.
Puthoff, Harold E., and Targ, Russell: Mind Reach: Scientists Look at Psychic Ability, Delta,
NY, 1978.
Puthoff, Harold E., and Targ, Russell (eds.): Mind at Large: Institute of Electrical and Electronic
Engineers Symposia on the Nature of Extrasensory Percection, Praeger, NY, 1979.
Raden, Dean: The Unconscious Universe, 19__.
Radiofrequency Radiation Dosimetry Handbook, USAF School of Aerospace Medicine, Brooks
AFB, TX, October 1986.
Ranelagh, John: The Agency, 1986 (ISBN: 0-671-44318-6).
Rappoport, Jon: US Mind Control Experiments on Children, Los Angeles, 1995 (bound xerox:
136 pages).
Rauscher, Elizabeth A.: Electromagnetic Phenomena in Complex Geometries and Nonlinear
Phenomena, Non-hertzian Waves, and Magnetic Monopoles, Tesla Book Co., Millbrae, CA,
1983.
Regan, David: Evoked Potentials.
Remote Mind Control Technology.
Renati, Charles, and hudson, Michael: The Silent Intruder, Houghton Mifflin, Boston, 1982 (208
pages).
Restak, Richard M.: The Brain: The Last Frontier, Doubleday Direct, Garden City, NY, 1979
(page 258).
Restak, Richard M.: The Mind, Bantam Books, NY, 1988.
Ricketts, L. W., Bridges, J. E., and Miletts, J.: EMP Radiation and Protective Techniques, John
Wiley & Sons, NY, 1976.
Riesen, W., et al.: A Pilot Study of the Interaction of Extremely Low Frequency Electromagnetic
Fields with Brain Organelles, IIT Research Institute (AD-748119), Chicago, IL, 1971.
Roper Organization, The: Unusual Personal Experiences: An Analysis of the Data from Three
National Surveys, Bigelow Holding Corp., Las Vegas, NY, 1991 (John Mack and Budd
Hopkins).
Rossman, Michael: New Age Blues: On the Politics of Consciousness, E.P. Dutton, NY, 1979
(chapter on mind control technology)/
Rucker, Rudy: Mind Tools.
Russell, Richard: The Man Who Knew Too Much.
Russell-Manning, Elizabeth (Betsy): Mass Mind Control of the American People, (selfpublished)
San Francisco, CA, 1992.
Russell-Manning, Elizabeth (Betsy): The Microwave Deception, Greensward Press, 1989 (ISBN:
0-930165-13-6).
Russell-Manning, Elizabeth (Betsy): Mind Control in a Free Society, 1989.
Russell-Manning, Elizabeth (Betsy), and Welsh, Cheryl: Whistleblowers, 1996 (bound xerox
available from Flatland Books: 276 pages) or Whistleblowers: Nonlethal Weapons, Greenswald,
Press, San Francisco, CA, 1996 (315 pages).
Sargent, William: Battle for the Mind: A Physiology of Conversion and Brainwashing,
Greenwood Press, Westport, CT, 1957.
Schaffranke, Rolf: Proofs of Free Energy Devices and Supporting Data, Tesla Book Co.,
Millbrae, CA, 1983.
Scheflin, Alan W., and Opton, Edward M., Jr.: Mind Manipulators: A Nonfiction Account,
Paddington Press, London, 1978.
Schmitt, F. O., and Schneider, D. M.: Functional Linkage in Biomolecular Systems, Raven Press,
NY, 1975.
Schnitzgebel, Robert L., and Schnitzgebel, Ralph K.: Psychotechnology: Electronic Control of
the Mind and Behavior, Holt, Rhinehart & Winston, NY, 1973.
Schrag, Peter: Mind Control, Pantheon Books, NY, 1978.
Schwarz, Jack: Human Energy Systems, E.P. Dutton, NY, 1980 (175 pages).
Sheffield, Charles, et al. (eds.): The World of 2044: Technological Development and the Future
of Society, Paragon House, 1994.
Shepherd, G. M.: The Synaptic Organization of the Brain, Oxford University Press, NY, 1974.
Sheppard, Asher R., and Eisenbud, Merril: Biological Effects of Electric and Magnetic Fields of
Extremely Low Frequency, New York University Press, NY, 1977 (229 pages).
Shukman, David: Tomorrow's War: The Threat of High-Technology Weapons, Harcourt Brace &
Co., 1996 (Formerly: The Sorcerer's Challenge, Hodden & Stoughton, London, 1995).
Siegel, Ronald K., and West, Louis Joyolon* (eds.): Hallucinations: Behavior, Experience, and
Theory, Wiley, NY, 1975 (*member: "Old Crows Association").
Siegel, Ronald K.: Whispers: The Voices of Paranoia, Crown Publishers, Inc., NY, 1994.
Smith, Cyril W., and Best, Simon: Electromagnetic Man: Health and Hazard in the Electrical
Environment, St. Martin's Press, Inc., NY, 1989.
Soyke, Fred, and Edmonds, Alan: The Ion Effect, E.P. Dutton, NY, 1977.
Steneck, Nicholas H.: The Microwave Debate, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1984.
Stine, G. Harry: The Silicon Gods, Bantam Books, NY.
Sweeney, H. Michael: Alice in Americaland.
Taylor, Brice: Starshine: One Woman's Valiant Escape from Mind Control, (MK-ultra victim).
$18.95 (includes s/h) from:
Brice Taylor Trust
P.O. Box 655
Landrum, SC 29356
[Brice Taylor also offers her recovery book, Revivification; "a gentle, alternative,
memory retrieval process for trauma survivors." $7.50 (includes s/h)]
[For more on Brice Taylor see her CKLN interview.]
Theury, Jacques: Microwaves: Industrial, Scientific, and Medical Applications, (670 pages).
Thomas, Gordon: Enslaved, Pharos Books, NY, 1981.
Thomas, Gordon: Journey into Madness: The True Story of Secret CIA Mind Control and
Medical Abuse, Bantam Books, NY, 1989 (388 pages).
The Transformation of America, (by George Leonard?).
Tubiana, Morris, et al.: Radiobiology.
Turner, William: Hoover's FBI.
Valenstein, Elliot S.: Brain Control: A Critical Examination of Brain Stimulation and
Psychosurgery.
John Wiley & Sons, NY, 1973.
Valerian, Valdamar: Matrix 3, "The Psycho-Social, Chemical, Biological, and Electric
Manipulation of Human Consciousness", 1994? (bound xerox: 730 pages).
Valerian, Valdamar: Matrix III, Vol. 2, "The Psycho-Social, Chemical, Biological, and Magnetic
Manipulation of Human Consciousness" 1995 (bound xerox: 707 pages).
Vankin, Jonathan: Conspiracies: Cover-ups and Crimes, Dell, NY, 1990.
Vankin, Jonathan: Conspiracies, Crimes, and Cover-ups: Political Manipulation and Mind
Control in America, Paragon House, NY, 1991.
Wallia, C. S.: Towards Century 21.
War in the Age of Intelligent Machines.
Warden, Patrick, A.: Mind Control and Mental Telepathy, Samizdat, Los Angeles, August 1,
1993.
Warshovsky, Fred: The Control of Life.
Watson, Peter: War on the Mind: Military Uses and Abuses of Psychology, Basic Books, Inc.,
NY, 1978.
Weinstein, Harvey M.: Psychiatry and the CIA: Victims of Mind Control, American Psychiatric
Press, Washington, DC, 1990.
Whalen, John: 50 Top Conspiracies of All Time.
White, John (ed.): Psychic Warfare: Fact or Fiction?, Aquarian, 1988 (book?).
Williams: Electromagnetic Brain Blaster.
Williamson, Samuel J. (ed.): Biomagnetism, Plenum Publishing Corp., NY, 1983.
Winn, Denise: The Manipulated Mind, The Octagon Press, NY, 1983.
Wolf, Alfred A.: The Body Quantum.
Yu, Alan: Millimeter Waves and Mind Control.
ARTICLES
ON
MIND CONROL
Aftergood, Steven: Secrecy and Government Bulletin, Issue 28, Nov. 1993.
Aftergood, Steven: "The Soft-Kill Fallacy," Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, pp. 40-45,
September/October 1994.
Alexander, John B.: "The new mental battlefield: Beam me up Spock," Military Review (A
U.S. Army Journal) pp. 47-54, December 1980.
The Associated Press: "Mind-altering microwaves: Soviets studying invisible ray," Los
Angeles Herald Examiner, Sec. A, p. 22, November 1976. *
Bacon, S.: "Now they're probing the hidden depths of your mind," Popular Mechanics, Vol. 136:
pp. 62-65, August 1971.
Barry, John, and Morganthau, Thomas: "Science of war: Non-lethal weapons," Newsweek, pp.
24-26, 7 February 1994.
Bartch, Paul: "Neurotransmission.," Resonance, No. 17: pp. 8-10, July 1990.
Bearden, Thomas: "An approach to understanding psychotronics," DDC (AD-A027866) June
1976.
Beardsley, Tim: "Making waves," Scientific American, Vol. 268 No. 2): p. 32, February 1993.
Beck, Robert C.: "ELF: Extremely low frequency fields: They affect us all in ways we may
never consciously realize!" Nexus, Vol. 2 (No. 6): pp. 11-15 & 66-67, January/February 1992.
Beck, Robert C.: "Extreme low frequency (ELF) magnetic fields and EEG entrainment: A
psychotronic warfare possibility?" Association for Humanistic Psychology Newsletter, April
1978 or Biomedical Research Associates, Los Angeles, CA, 1978.
Besly, Kim: "Electromagnetic pollution: A little known health hazard. A new means of
control," Preliminary Report, Greenham Common Woman's Peace Camp, Inland House,
Southbourne, Emsworth, Hants, England , 1993.
"Biomedical Aspects of Nonionizing Radiation, Naval Weapons Laboratory (NWL) Dahlgren,
VA, Symposium, 10 July 1973.
Blackmon, Janet: "Woman fears government zapping," Sun Journal, New Bern, NC, 28
September 1992. (Mildred Cooper)
Boyce, Nell: "Bioterrorism Special Report: Nowhere to Hide," New Scientist Vol. : pp .,
March 21, 1998.
Brodeur, Paul: "A reporter at large: Microwaves -I and -II," New Yorker, 13, 27 December
1976.
Budiansky, Stephen, and Good, Erica, E.: "Orlikow v. US," US News & World Report
(Investigative Report) Vol. (No.): p. 34, 24 January 1994.
Burrell, Garland E., Jr.: "Mental privacy: An international safeguard to governmental intrusion
into the mental processes," California Western International Law Journal, Vol. 6: pp, 110+,
1975.
Butler, Declan: "Advances in neuroscience may threaten human rights," Nature, Vol. 391
(Issue): p. 319, January 1998. *
Butterfield, Fox: "$2.15 million for hidden weapon research," The New York Times, Seattle
Post Intelligencer, Sec. A-3, Friday, 10 March 1995.
Byrne, Harlan S.: "California microwaves," Barrons, Vol. 72 (No. 13): pp. 48-49, 30 March
1992.
Cannon, Martin: "Mind control and the American Government," Lobster, No. 23, 1993.
Caylor, Ron: "Government working on machine that can read your mind," The National
Enquirer, June 22, 1976. (article created sensation)
Chernishev, I.: "Can rulers make 'zombies' and control the world?" Orienteer, pp. 58-62,
February 1997.
Collins, Larry: "Mind Control," Playboy, January 1990.
Coupland, Robin M.: "Non-lethal weapons: Precipitating a new arms race? Medicine must
guard against its knowledge being used for weapon development," British Medical Journal, Vol.
315: p. 72, 12 July 1997.
Crary, David: "Soldiers recount most memorable Iraqi surrenders," Associated Press The Daily
Commercial, March 1, 1991.
DeBoskey, Bruce H.: "Nonionizing radiation: Hidden hazards," Trial Magazine, Vol. 26, (No.
8): pp. 32-36, August 1990.
De Caro, Chuck: "Washington: The zap gap: The Soviets may be ahead of us in the
development of radio-frequency weapons," Atlantic Monthly, pp. 24-28, March 1987. *
DeLeno, Steven: "Electronic Concentration Camp."
"Disabling people and electronics," Microwave News, January/February 1996. *
DoD, Intel agencies look at Russian mind control technology claims," Defense Electronics, July
1993.
Dodgen, Larry: Non-lethal weapons," U.S. News & World Report, Vol. (No.): p. 5, August 4,
1997.
Dornheim, M.A.: "U.S.A.F. studying brainwaves to increase crew performances," Aviation
Week and Space Technology, Vol. 20: pp. 18+, February 1986.
Doswald-Beck, Louise and Cauderay, Gerald C.: "The development of new antipersonnel
weapons," International Review of the Red Cross, Vol. 279 , 1 November 1990.
Edwards, D.D.: "Cells haywire in electromagnetic field?" Science News, Vol. 133: pp. 216, 2
April 1988 (work of W.R. Adey).
Edwards, D. D.: "ELF: The current controversy," Science News, Vol. 131: pp. 107-109, 14
February 1987.
"Electromagnetic fields: New-wave coverage issues," Best's Review, 1991.
Elliott, Dorinda, and Barry, John: "A subliminal Dr. Strangelove. Mind: Using the power of
hidden suggestions, this Russian Scientist (Igor Smirnov) tries to rewire the brain," Newsweek,
p. 57, 22 August 1994.
"Emerging threat..."
"Expert meeting on certain weapon systems and on implementation mechanisms in international
law," Report of the International Committee of the Red Cross, Geneva, Switzerland, May 30 -
June 1, 1994 (issued July 1994).
"Final Report on Biotechnology Research Requirements for Aeronautical Systems through the
Year 2000," Vols. I and II, Southwest Research Institute, San Antonio, TX, 1982.
"From Russia with love.At Los Alamos?" Intelligence Report: Parade Special Supplement,
1993?
"German workshop on mechanisms of EMF interactions," Microwave News,
November/December 1991.
Glenn, J.C.: "Conscious technology: The co-evolution of mind and machine," Futurist,
September/October 1989.
Herron, Robert (Maj.): "Electronic Warfare: New priority for next generation fighters,"
Aerospace America, p. 64, 1984.
Hough, Warren: "High tech civilian control studied: Secret Pentagon - DOJ Memo of
Understanding, `Nonlethal' weapons under development are being added to the government
arsenal in its war against its own citizens," The Spotlight, p. , July 31, 1995. *
Hutchison, Michael: MegaBrain Report: The Psycho-technology Newsletter
Keeler, Anna: "Remote mind control technology," Full Disclosure, Vol. 15: pp. 1-14, 1989;
Also published in Mike Coyle's MindNet Journal, Vol. 1 (No. 23a: Part I & No. 23b: Part II);
and in Resonance, No. 23: Part I: pp. 3-14, February 1993 & No. 24: Part II: pp. 3-16, May 1992.
*
Kelly, Jack A. and Conway, Joseph: "Non-lethal weapons: Emerging requirements for security
strategy," Institute for Foreign Policy Analysis, May 1996.
Kempster, Norman: "Sci-fi comes true: Mind reading machine tells secrets of the brain," Los
Angeles Times, March 20, 1976. *
Krawczyk, Glenn: Nexus, Vol. 2 (No. 22); pp., October/November 1994.
Krawczyk, Glenn: "Big brother's recipe for 'Revolution in Military Affairs'", Nexus, pp. 31-36,
June/July 1995. *
Lopez, Ramon: "Special operations survive Pentagon budget constraints," International Defense
Review, Vol. 26 (No. 3): p. 247, 12 December 1994.
MacGregor, R.J.: "A brief survey of literature relating to low-intensity microwaves on nervous
function," RAND Report, R-4397, June 1970.
MacGregor, R.J.: "A direct mechanism for the direct influence of microwave radiation on
neuroelectric function," RAND Report R-4397, June 1970 - ("The electrical component of
microwave radiation induces transmember potentials in nerve cells and thereby disturbs nervous
function and behavior.").
MacKenzie, Debora: Bioterrorism Special Report: Bioarmageddon," New Scientist, Vol.
September 19, 1998.
Maddox, J., et al.: "", Nature, Vol. 334 (No. ): 287-, 1988.
Mann, Paul: "Mass weapons threat deepens worldwide," Aviation Week & Space Technology,
Vo.. 144 (No. 25): p. 58, 17 June 1996.
Manning, Jeane: "Electronic telepathy devise" (unnamed source, from Angels Don't Play This
HAARP)
Martin, Harry V., and Caul, David: "Mind control," (A 13-part series) The Napa Sentinel,
Napa, CA 1995.
Matthews, Owen: Report: "Soviets used top secret 'psychotronic' weapons," Moscow Times,
Sec. 750, 11 July 1995.
McAuliffe, Kathleen: "The mind fields," Omni Magazine, pp. 258-267, February 1985.
McKinney, Julianne: "Microwave harassment and mind control experimentation," Unclassified,
Vol. IV (No. 3) Parts I & II: 20 pgs., June/July 1992. *
Merritt, J. H., et al.: "Some biological effects of microwave energy directed at the head,"
(Unpublished and unclassified abstract circulated to conference participants. Conference was
sponsored by the DoD Electromagnetic Compatibility Analysis Center) 19??. (See Steneck,
Nicholas: The Microwave Debate, p.)
Metz, Steven, and Keivit, James: "The revolution in military affairs and conflict short of war,"
Strategic Studies Institute (SSI), U.S. Army War College, U.S. Government Printing Office (No.
1994-504-111/00089) July 25, 1994 (references to mind manipulation).
Michrowski, Andrew: "Covert ELF warfare," Specula (formerly published as The Journal of the
American Association of Metascience) p. 27, January/March 1980.
"Microwave measurements," Aviation Week and Space Technology, Vol. 144 (no. 18): p. 73, 29
April 1996.
Microwave News, May/June 1988.
"Military on non-lethal weapons: A very attractive option," Microwave News,
November/December 1993.
"The Mind Control Papers," Freedom News Journal, 1980 (ISBN: 0-915509-35-3)?
"Mind-reading computer," Futurist, p. 49, May/June 1992.
Mintz, John: "The secret's out: Covert E-Systems, Inc. covets commercial sales," The
Washington Post, p. A-1, A-10, 24 October 1994.
Mizrach, Steve: "Electromagnetic effects on human behavior," MindNet Journal, Vol. 1 (No.
82) July 1996. *
Mollick, Ethan: "A gentler war: The debate over non-lethal weapons," Harvard International
Review, Vol. 18 (No. 4): p.46, Fall 1996.
Morrison, David C.: "Sites unseen: A sketch of the Pentagon's secret 'black' bases used for
stealth aircraft, special operations, and electronic eavesdropping programs emerges from a
National Journal study," National Journal (Defense Report) pp. 1468-1472, June 4, 1988. *
Opall, Barbara: "U.S. experts: Focus arms control goals," Defense News, p. 6, 24-30
November 1997. Opall, Barbara: "U.S. explores mind control technology," Defense News,
pp. 4, 29, January 11-17, 1993. *
Opall, Barbara: "U.S, Russia hope to safeguard mind-control techniques," Defense News, p. 4,
11-17 January 1993.
Page, J.: "Tuning in on brainwaves," Science, Vol. 5: pp. 88+, October 1984.
Pasternak, Douglas: "Wonder weapons: The Pentagon's quest for nonlethal arms is amazing.
But is it smart?" US News & World Report (Special Report), Vol. 123 (No. 1): pp. 38-46, July
7, 1997. *
Pengelley, Rupert: "Wanted: A watch on non-lethal weapons," International Defense Review,
Vol. 24 (No. 4): p. 1, 1 April 1994.
"Perry plans to launch nonlethal warfare", Defense News, September 19-25, 1994.
Persinger, Michael A.: "On the possibility of directly accessing every human brain by
electromagnetic induction of fundamental algorithms," MindNet Journal, Vol. 1 (No. 65) June
1995.
Pool, Robert: "Electromagnetic fields: The biological evidence," Science, Vol. 249: pp. 1378-
1381, 21 September 1990.
Posner, Michael I.: "Seeing the mind," Science, Vol. 262: pp. 673-674, 29 October 1993.
Possony, Stefan: "Scientific advances hold dramatic prospects for phy-strat," Defense and
Foreign Affairs, Vol. 34, July 1983.
Ray, J.: "The body magnetic," Buzzworm, Vol. 4: p. 22, September/October 1992.
Ricks, Thomas E.: "Nonlethal arms: New class of weapons could incapacitate foe yet limit
casualties," The Wall Street Journal, pp. A1 & A4, January 4, 1993. *
Rosenberg, Barbara Hatch: "Non-lethal weapons may violate treaties," The Bulletin of the
Atomic Scientists, pp. 44 - 45, September - October 1994. (Note: Rosenberg gives the full
name of this treaty as "Convention on prohibition or Restriction of the Use of Certain
Conventional Weapons which may be deemed to be Excessively Injurious or to have
Indiscriminate Effects.")
Schmitt, Eric: "Zany new weapons for U.S. team in Somalia," International Herald Tribune, 16
February 1995.
Schmitz, Tom: "California's Livermore weighs plan to use Russian technology," The Journal of
Commerce, April 8, 1993. *
Selden, Gary: "Machines that read minds," Science Digest, Octorber 1981.
Sharp, Joseph C. et al.: "Generation of acoustic signals by pulsed microwave energy," IEEE
Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, May 1974.
Shorto, Russell: "Armageddon: Killing them softly," Gentlemen's Quarterly, March 1995. *
"Still under wraps" Aviation Week and Space Technology, pp. 35+, June 7, 1993.
Sweetman, Sherri: Report on the Attorney General's Conference on Less than Lethal Weapons,
U.S. Dept. of Justice, National Institute of Justice, March 1987.
Thomas Timothy: "The mind has no firewall," Parameters: U.S. Army War College Quarterly,
Vol. 28 (No. 1): pp. 84-92, Spring 1998. *
Tigner, Brooks: "NATO panel to consider non-lethal weapon guidelines," Defense News, p. 14,
29 September 1997.
Tigner, Brooks: "Europeans protest U.S. ionospheric research," Defense News, p. 3, 16-22
February 1998.
Tyler: IN: Dean, David J. (ed.): Low-intensity Conflict and Modern Technology, Air
University Press, USAF, Center for Aerospace Doctrine, Research, and Education, Maxwell
AFB, AL, June 1986. *
"U.S. Nullifies Nuremberg Law," Earth Island Journal, p. 18, Winter 1996-97. *
Victorian, Armen: "The military use of electromagnetic, microwave, and mind control
technology," Lobster, No. 34: pp 2-7, Winter 1998; Also published in Resonance, No., April
1998.
Victorian, Armen: "Mind reading computer," Time Magazine, 1 July 1974.
Victorian, Armen: "Neural manipulation by remote radar," Resonance, No. 30: pp. 25-28,
March 1996; Also published in Lobster No. 30. *
Victorian, Armen: "Psychic warfare and nonlethal weapons."
Walker, Martin: "Dark dreamer of Star Wars," 5 May 1995.
Wall, Judy: "Electromagnetic weapons," Resonance, No. 29: pp 27-33, May 1995. *
Wall, Judy: "Military use of mind control weapons," Nexus, pp. 11 - 16, October - November
1998. (Unedited version originally published in Resonance, No. 33, April 1998. *
Wall, Judy: "Synthetic telemetry," Resonance No. 29: pp. 17 - 26, May 1995. *
Weiner, Malcolm H., Chairman: "Non-lethal technologies: Military options and implications",
Report of an independent task force sponsored by the Council on Foreign Relations released June
22, 1995.
Wright, Steve: "An appraisal of technologies for political control," European Parliament
Scientific and Technological Options Assessment (STOA) Luxembourg, European Parliament, 6
January 1998.
IMPORTANT
TECHNICAL REFERENCES
http://www.raven1.net/lida.htm
Photo and description of the Korean War LIDA machine, a radio frequency brain entrainment
device.
http://www.raven1.net/frey.htm
"Human Auditory System Response To Modulated Electromagnetic Energy," Allan H. Frey,
General Electric, Advanced Electronics Center, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York.
http://www.raven1.net/v2s-nasa.htm
NASA technical report abstract stating that speech-to-skull is feasible.
http://www.raven1.net/v2s-kohn.htm
DOD/EPA small business initiative (SBIR) project to study the unclassified use of voice-toskull
technology for military uses.
http://www.raven1.net/bioamp.htm
Excerpts, Proceedings of Joint Symposium on Interactions of Electromagnetic Waves with
Biological Systems, 22nd General Assembly of the International Union of Radio Science,
August 25 - September 2, 1987, Tel Aviv, Israel.
http://www.raven1.net/v2succes.htm
Excerpt, Dr. Don R. Justesen, neuropsychological researcher, describes Dr. Joseph C. Sharp's
successful transmission of "words" via a pulse-rate- modulated microwave transmitter of the
Frey type.
http://www.raven1.net/russ.htm
FOIA article circulated among U.S. agencies describing the Russian TV program "Man and
Law", which gives a glimpse into the Russian mind control efforts. (Dr. Igor Smirnov, a major
player, was used as a consultant to the FBI at the Waco Branch Davidian standoff.)
http://www.raven1.net/armyparw.htm
SBIR (small business initiative contract) which clearly shows intent to use ultrasound as an antipersonnel
weapon, including one-man portability and with power to kill.
http://www.raven1.net/acouspot.htm
A page originally from the MIT Media Lab's acoustic engineer, Joseph Pompeii. Describes a
similar technique under commercial and military development (American Technologies Corp.,
San Diego) under the trade name "Hypersonic Sound". Shows that sound can be focused to the
extent of targeting just one person in a crowd, acoustically, using ultrasound.
APPENDIX A
Electromagnetic Weapons Timeline:
Electromagnetic (EM) weapons are of recent invention. They utilize the various frequencies of
the electromagnetic spectrum to disable or kill the target. Psychotronic weapons are those EM
weapons that interact with the nervous system of the target. These weapons usually operate in
the very low (100 to 1,000 Hz) or extremely low (greater than zero but less than 100 Hz)
frequency ranges.
1934 "A method for Remote Control of Electrical Stimulation of the Nervous System", a
monograph by Drs. E. L. Chaffee and R. U. Light.
1934 Experiments in Distant Influence, book by Soviet Professor Leonid L. Vasiliev
Vasiliev also wrote an article, "Critical Evaluation of the Hypogenic Method" concerning the
work of Dr. I. F. Tomashevsky on experiments in remote control of the brain.
1945 After World War II, the Allies discovered the Japanese had been developing a "death ray"
utilizing very short radio waves focused into a high power beam. Tests were done on animals.
1950 The French conducted research on infrasonic weapons. (From "The Road From
Armageddon", by Peter Lewis, Resonance #13, pp 9-14).
1953 John C. Lilly, when asked by the director of the National Institute of Mental Health
(NIMH) to brief the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI),
National Security Agency (NSA), and the various military intelligence services on his work
using electrodes to stimulate directly the pleasure and pain centers in the brain, refused.
1958, 1962 The U.S. conducts high-altitude Electromagnetic Pulse (EMP) bomb tests over the
Pacific. (From "The Road From Armageddon" by Peter Lewis.)
1960 Headlines read "Khrushchev Says Soviets Will Cut Forces a Third; Sees 'Fantastic
Weapon' ". (From article of same title, by Max Frankel, New York Times, Jan. 15, 1960, p1 as
cited in "Tesla's Electro-magnetics and Its Soviet Weaponization", paper by T. E. Bearden.)
1965 A "Death Ray" weapon was developed by McFarlane Corporation, described as a
modulated electron gun X-ray nuclear booster, could be adapted to communications, remote
control and guidance systems, EM radiation telemetry and death ray.
Reported hearings before the House Subcommittee on Department of Defense Appropriations,
chaired by Rep. George Mahon (Dem. - Texas). From "Hearing Voices" by Alex Constantine,
Hustler, January 1994, pp 102-104, 113, 120, 134. Research by Harlan Girard.
1965 Project Pandora was undertaken in which chimpanzees were exposed to microwave
radiation. The man who was in charge of this project said, 'the potential for exerting a degree of
control on human behavior by low level microwave radiation seems to exist' and he urged that
the effects of microwaves be studied for 'possible weapons applications' - (From
"Electromagnetic Pollution: A Little Known Health Hazard. A new means of control?" by Kim
Besley, Great Britain, p14. Research from Woody Blue).
1968 Dr. Gordon J. F. MacDonald, science advisor to President Lyndon Johnson, wrote,
"Perturbation of the environment can produce changes in behavioral patterns." He was referring
to low frequency EM waves in the ionosphere affecting human brain wave patterns. (From his
book, Unless Peace Comes, a Scientific Forecast of New Weapons, cited in "New World Order
ELF Psychotronic Tyranny", a paper by C. B. Baker.)
1970 Zbigniew Brzezinski, President Jimmy Carter's National Security Director, said in his
book, Between Two Ages, weather control was a new weapon that would be the key element of
strategy. "Technology will make available to leaders of major nations a variety of techniques for
conducting secret warfare..." He also wrote "Accurately timed, artificially excited electronic
strokes could lead to a pattern of oscillations that produce relatively high power levels over
certain regions of the Earth ... one could develop a system that would seriously impair the brain
performance of a very large population in selected regions over an extended period."(Cited in
Baker's "ELF Psychotronic Tyranny" paper.)
1972 The Taser, first electrical shock device developed for use by law enforcement, delivers
barbed, dart shaped electrodes to a subject's body, and 50,000 volt pulses at two millionths of an
amp over 12-14 seconds time. (From "Report on the Attorney General's Conference on Less
Than Lethal Weapons", by Sherry Sweetman, 1987, p4, which cites "Non-Lethal Weapons for
Law Enforcement: Research Needs and Priorities. A Report to the National Science Foundation
by the Security Planning Corporation, 1972. Research by Harlan Girard.)
1972 "A U.S. Department of Defense document said that the Army has tested a microwave
weapon. It was an extremely powerful 'electronic flamethrower'." (From "Electromagnetic
Pollution.")
1972 "A study published by the U.S. Army Mobility Equipment Research and Development
Center, titled 'Analysis of Microwaves for Barrier Warfare' examines the plausibility of using
radio frequency energy in barrier counter-barrier warfare ... The report concludes that:
(a) it is possible to field a truck-portable microwave barrier system that will
completely immobilize personnel in the open with present day technology;
(b) there is a strong potential for a microwave system that would be capable of
delaying or immobilizing personnel in vehicles;
(c) with present technology, no method could be identified for a microwave
system to destroy the type of armored material common to tanks."
(From "Electromagnetic Pollution" by Kim Besly, p15, quoting The Zapping of America by Paul
Brodeur.) The report further documents the ability to create third-degree burns on human skin
using 3 GHz at 20-watts/square centimeter in two seconds.
1972 Dr. Gordon J. F. MacDonald testified before the House Subcommittee on Oceans and
International Environment, concerning low frequency research: "The basic notion there was to
create between the electrically charged ionosphere in the higher part of the atmosphere and
conducting layers of the surface of the Earth this neutral cavity, to create waves, electrical waves
that would be tuned to the brainwaves ... about ten cycles per second ... you can produce changes
in behavioral patterns or in responses." (From Baker's "ELF Psychotronic Tyranny" paper.)
1973 Sharp and Grove transmit audible words via microwaves.
1975 - 1977 "Unpublished analyses of microwave bioeffects literature were disseminated to the
U.S. Congress and to other officials arguing the case for remote control of human behavior by
radar." (From the Journal of Microwave Power, 12(4), 1977, p320. Research by Harlan Girard.)
1978 Hungarians presented a state-of-the-art paper on infrasonic weapons to the United Nations,
"Working Paper on Infrasound Weapons", United Nations CD/575, 14 August 1978. (From
"The Road From Armageddon" by Peter Lewis.)
1981 - 1982 "Between 1981 and September 1982, the Navy commissioned me to investigate the
potential of developing electromagnetic devices that could be used as non-lethal weapons by the
Marine Corp for the purpose of 'riot control', hostage removal, clandestine operations, and so
on." Eldon Byrd, Naval Surface Weapons Center, Silver Spring MD. (From "Electromagnetic
Pollution" by Kim Besly, p12.)
1982 Electromagnetic weapons for law enforcement use in Great Britain: Charles Bovill of the
now defunct British firm, Allen International, developed a 10-30 Hz strobe light that can produce
seizures, giddiness, nausea, and fainting. Addition of sound pulses in the 4.0 - 7.5 Hz range
increases effectiveness, as utilized in the Valkyrie, a "frequency" weapon advertised in British
Defense Equipment Catalogue until 1983.
The squawk box or sound curdles uses two loudspeakers of 350-watt output to emit two slightly
different frequencies that combine in the ear to produce a shrill shrieking noise. The U.S.
National Science Foundation report says there is "severe risk of permanent impairment of
hearing." (From "Electropollution" by Kim Besley, citing the Manchester City Council Police
Monitoring Unit document.)
1982 Air Force review of biotechnology: "Currently available data allow the projection that
specially generated radio frequency radiation (RFR) fields may pose powerful and revolutionary
antipersonnel military threats. Electroshock therapy indicates the ability of induced electric
current to completely interrupt mental functioning for short periods of time, to obtain cognition
for longer periods and to restructure emotional response over prolonged intervals.
"... impressed electromagnetic fields can be disruptive to purposeful behavior and may be
capable of directing and/or interrogating such behavior. Further, the passage of approximately
100 milliamperes through the myocardium can lead to cardiac standstill and death, again
pointing to a speed-of-light weapons effect.
"A rapidly scanning RFR system could provide an effective stun or kill capability over a large
area."
(From Final Report on Biotechnology Research Requirements for Aeronautical Systems Through
the Year 2000. AFOSR-TR-82-0643, vol 1,and vol 2, 30 July 1982.)
1986 "The Electromagnetic Spectrum in Low-Intensity Conflict" by Captain Paul Tyler, MC,
USN quotes the above passage and further elaborates on the theme. (Published in Low Intensity
Conflict and Modern Technology Lt. Col. David J. Dean, USAF, ed., Air University Press,
Maxwell AFB, AL.Research by Harlan Girard.)
1983 Nikolai Khokhlov, a Soviet KGB agent who defected to the West in 1976, interviews
recently arrived scientists and reports: "The Soviet mind- control program is run by the KGB
with unlimited funds." (From The Spectator, February 5, 1983, reported in "New World Order
Psychotronic Tyranny" by C. B. Baker.)
1984 "USSR: New Beam Energy Possible?" possibly associated with early Soviet weather
engineering efforts over the U.S. (From "Tesla's Electromagnetics and Its Soviet Weaponization"
by T. E. Bearden.)
1985 Women in the peace camps at Greenham Common began showing various medical
symptoms believed to be caused by EM surveillance weapons beamed at them. (See "Zapping:
The New Weapon of the Patriarchy", Resonance #13, pp 22-24. Research by Woody Blue.)
1986 Attorney General's Conference on Less Than Lethal Weapons reviews current weapons
available. They include the Taser, the Nova XR-5000 Stun Gun (can interrupt a pacemaker); the
Talon, a glove with an electrical pulse generator; and the Source, a flashlight with electrodes at
the base.
Photonic driving strobe lights tested by one conference delegate on 100 subjects, produced
discomfort. Closed eyelids to not block the effect. Evidence that ELF produces nausea and
disorientation. Suggestion to develop fast acting electro sleep inducing EM weapon.
Discusses problem of testing weapons on animals and human "volunteers". (From "Report on
the Attorney General's Conference on Less Than Lethal Weapons", by Sherry Sweetman, March
1987, prepared for the National Institute of Justice. Research by Harlan Girard.)
1988 The Pentagon is ordered by courts to cease EMP tests at several locations due to a lawsuit
filed by an environmental group. (From The Washington Post, May 15, 1988, see "U.S. and
Soviets Develop Death Ray", Resonance 11, p10. Research by Remy Chevalier.)
1992 December. "The U.S. Army's Armament Research, Development and Engineering Center
is conducting a one-year study of ACOUSTIC BEAM TECHNOLOGY ... the command
awarded the one year study to Scientific Applications and Research Associates of Huntington
Beach CA. Related research is conducted at the Moscow based Andreev Institute." (From
"U.S. Explores Russian Mind Control Technology", by Barbara Opal, Defense News, January
11-17, 1993. Research by Harlan Girard and others.)
1993 The Russian government is offering to share with the United States in a bilateral Center for
Psychotechnologies the Soviet mind-control technology developed during the 1970s. The work
was funded by the Department of Psycho-Correction at the Moscow Medical Academy.
"Acoustic psycho-correction involves the transmission of specific commands via static or white
noise bands into the human subconscious..." The Russian experts, among them former KGB
General George Kotov, present in a paper a list of software and hardware available for $80,000.
(From Opal article, "U.S. Explores Russian Mind Control Technology".)
1993 February 28, beginning of 51 day siege on the Branch Davidians at Waco Texas, which
ended in the death of more than 80 people.
Until this incident, the electromagnetic weapons had kept a very low profile. But in the
documentary video, "Waco: The Big Lie Continues", footage from the British Broadcasting
(BBC) shows at least three EM weapons used by U.S. government agents. First, the noise
generators used against the Davidians. Second, a powerful strobe light, shown during a
nighttime sequence.
And the third was the Russian psychoacoustics weapon, considered, but agents deny use of this
weapon against the Waco people. FBI agents met with Dr. Igor Smirnov in Arlington VA to
discuss the possibility of using the weapon against the Davidians. (From "A Subliminal Dr.
Strangelove", by Dorinda Elliot and John Barry, Newsweek, August 22, 1994)
APPENDIX B
Most Common Known ELF Effects: Here is a list of most of the common effects. It is
intended to show how the various induced stress effects are broken down. Indent levels are used
to show categories and sub-categories:
Invasive At-a-Distance Body Effects (including mind):
Sleep deprivation and fatigue:
Silent but instantaneous application of "electronic caffeine" signal, forces awake
and keeps awake
Loud noise from neighbors, usually synchronized to attempts to fall asleep
Precision-to-the-second "allowed sleep" and "forced awakening"; far too precise
and repeated to be natural
Daytime "fatigue attacks", can force the victim to sleep and/or weaken the
muscles to the point of collapse
Audible Voice to Skull (V2S):
Delivered by apparent at a distance radio signal
Made to appear as emanating from thin air
Voices or sound effects only the victim can hear
Inaudible Voice to Skull (Silent Sound):
Delivered by apparent at a distance radio signal; manifested by sudden urges to do
something/go somewhere you would not otherwise want to; silent (ultrasonic)
hypnosis presumed
Programming hypnotic "triggers" - i.e., specific phrases or other cues which cause
specific involuntary actions
Violent muscle triggering (flailing of limbs):
Leg or arm jerks to violently force awake and keep awake
Whole body jerks, as if body had been hit by large jolt of electricity
Violent shaking of body; seemingly as if on a vibrating surface but where surface
is in reality not vibrating
Precision manipulation of body parts (slow, specific purpose):
Manipulation of hands, forced to synchronize with closed-eyes but FULLY
AWAKE vision of previous day; very powerful and coercive, not a dream
Slow bending almost 90 degrees BACKWARDS of one toe at a time or one finger
at a time
Direct at-a-distance control of breathing and vocal cords; including involuntary
speech iv. Spot blanking of memory, long and short term
Reading said-silently-to-self thoughts:
Engineered skits where your thoughts are spoken to you by strangers on street or
Real time reading sub vocalized words, as while the victim reads a book, and
BROADCASTING those words to nearby people who form an amazed audience
around the victim
Direct application of pain to body parts:
Hot-needles-deep-in-flesh sensation
Electric shocks (no wires whatsoever applied)
Powerful and unquenchable itching, often applied precisely when victim attempts
to do something to expose this "work"
"Artificial fever", sudden, no illness present v. sudden racing heartbeat, relaxed
situation
Surveillance and tracking:
Thru-wall radar and rapping under your feet as you move about your apartment,
on ceiling of apartment below
Thru-wall radar used to monitor starting and stopping of your urination - water
below turned on and off in sync with your urine stream
Loud, raucous artificial bird calls everywhere the victim goes, even into the
wilderness
Invasive Physical Effects at a Distance (non-body):
Stoppage of power to appliances (temporary, breaker ON)
Manipulation of appliance settings
Temporary failures that "fix themselves"
Flinging of objects, including non-metallic
Precision manipulation of switches and controls
Forced, obviously premature failure of appliance or parts
External Stress-Generating "Skits":
Participation of strangers, neighbors, and in some cases close friends and family members
in harassment:
Rudeness for no cause
Tradesmen always have "problems", block your car, etc.
Purchases delayed, spoiled, or lost at a high rate
Unusually loud music, noise, far beyond normal
Break-ins/sabotage at home:
Shredding of clothing
Destruction of furniture
Petty theft
Engineered failures of utilities
Sabotage at work:
Repetitive damage to furniture
Deletion/corruption of computer files
Planting viruses which could not have come from your computer usage pattern
Delivered goods delayed, spoiled, or lost at a high rate
Spreading of rumors, sabotage to your working reputation
Direct sabotage and theft of completed work; tradesmen often involved and
showing obvious pleasure
In summary, the effects include:
To the Brain:
Forced memory blanking and induced erroneous actions
Induced changes to hearing. Both apparent direction and volume, and sometimes even content
Reading and broadcasting thoughts. "How can that lady talk with her mouth closed?"
Vivid controlled dreams.
Forced waking visions: some synched with forced body motion
Microwave hearing
Sleep prevention each nigh, at exactly the same time (for weeks)
To the FaceL
Sudden violent itching inside eyelids
Forced manipulation of airways, including externally controlled forced speech
"Transparent eyelids"
Artificial tinnitus (ringing in ears)
Forced movement of jaw and clacking of teeth
To the Body:
Wilding racing heart without cause
Remotely induced violent no-rash itching
Forced nudging of arm during delicate or messy work causing injury or spills
Forced "muscle quaking" on large muscles on the back or other unexplainable vibrations
Cases of repeated fresh watch batteries dying
Forced precision manipulation of hands. Sometimes synched to the forced waking visions.
Special attention to genital area: itching, forced orgasm, intense pain, "hot needles"
Intense general pain in the legs, like stings.
[Remind you, that these are the unclassified effects only.]
RICHARD ALAN MILLER
Lectures, Writing, & Research
Author & researcher Richard Alan Miller reveals a wealth and depth of knowledge and experience in three major
fields; Alternative Agriculture, New Age Physics, and Metaphysics. Before many leading edge concepts became
trendy topics, Miller was (and is) in the international front lines of research, experimentation and documentation.
His focus on botanicals made him the leading world authority on herb farming, processing and marketing. With
numerous books, bi-lines and websites (www.nwbotanicals.org), Miller's visionary work with Alternative
Agriculture continues to be 20 years ahead including concepts such as sustainability, intercropping, and Forest
Farming.
Taking a step behind the scenes of "black ops" research is for most of us limited to speculations. Miller began
working in that "X-Files" world in the 60s and has amazing experiences and conclusions to share. An original teammember,
"man-in-black," Miller's research in the field of Parapsychology & Paraphysics began as a graduate
physicist working 10 years with Army Intel/Pentagon.
During this period numerous foundational papers, including "A Holographic Concept of Reality" and "Embryonic
Holography" were written. Richard Alan Miller's most recent work, "Synthetic Telepathy and the Early Mind Wars"
discusses how some of his earlier work contributed to new "mind altering" technologies and their current
applications.
His most recent works at Nexus Conferences in Brisbane, 2004 and Amsterdam, 2005 was titled “The Non-Local
Mind In A Holographic Universe.” He also has semi-technical papers to be presented in Anaheim at The World
Nutra Conference in October, 2005. Title: “Lab-Grown Cordyceps sinsensis Hybrid: A Nano-Processed Medicinal
Mushroom that Really Delivers.”
Offering fresh perspectives on Metaphysical traditions his books, papers & articles integrate his scientific research
with time-honored metaphysical concepts, leading to such works as The Modern Alchemist; A Guide to Personal
Transformation and The Diamond Body, a Synergetic Approach to Mysticism.
He brings a similar integration to The Magical & Ritual Use of Herbs and The Magical & Ritual use of
Aphrodisiacs. Miller is listed in Who's Who in the World, America, and the West.
Richard Alan Miller
Northwest Botanicals, Inc.
(541) 476-5588
(541) 476-1823 (fax)
www.nwbotanicals.org
www.herbfarminfo.com

Synthetic Telepathy Part 1

Part I: Models of Synthetic Telepathy
Allen Barker, July 31, 2002

This article, the first of a series, deals with models of the mind control network. It is an elaboration and summary of some of the ideas expressed in my earlier essay "The Autopig." See also "Mental Firewalls" and "Special Powers and ESP.". For a list of some of the basic abbreviations used in the current series, see the document outlining abbreviations used in the essays. The later articles in this current series are listed at the end.
Please bear with the intro, even if the ideas seem unfamiliar at first. The sections near the end should make sense even without a complete grasp of the early sections, and will tend to clarify the ideas and make them more concrete. I do not cover the mental illness possibility and cover lie here because I have discussed it elsewhere, but remember that torture is not called torture because it is a picnic in the park. It leaves scars and sequelae.

Model independent reasoning

In the context we are working in, a model is an assumed framework for what facts hold. There are various possible models. Multiple model reasoning involves considering various models simultaneously. Model independent reasoning involves making decisions or coming to conclusions that hold in all models -- or at least in all tangibly likely models or in some collection of models. As a brief example, consider this binary tree split: Either the government is involved directly (CIA, etc.) or it is not (and non-government people are the perpetrators, with government at most indirectly involved). These are two models (or classes of models). It can be useful to evaluate the facts and the data with respect to each of these models. In some cases the government is directly involved and in others it is not, so this is an individual, victim-based model system. What model independent conclusion can be drawn?
The government is culpable and is the responsible party to petition for redress in both cases. So this conclusion is model independent with respect to those models. In the first case the culpability is obvious. In the second, it is clear that one of the main functions of government is to protect the citizens, especially their fundamental rights. The most fundamental right, underlying all others, is the freedom of thought. By refusing to fairly consider victims' claims and implicitly supporting such repression the government is also indirectly at best supporting a system of repression. These "psychic lynchings," -- under any model -- are very much in line with the long US history of civil rights abuses which the government has long turned a blind eye to. Note also that most victims still undergo criminal stalking and harassment in addition to the mind violations -- whatever the model.

The standard model

I refer to the assumption that technological mind control techniques are the underlying mechanism for most mind control abuses as the standard model. This model also includes techniques such as drugging and hypnosis -- which are known to have been applied in projects like MKULTRA and Bluebird -- as well as the combinations of these techniques with recent technology like voice-to-skull transmission devices.
As an example of an alternative model, consider what I call the natural model. This model assumes that what is occurring with many mind control victims is the abuse of natural psychic abilities. For example, it might be originating from a hostile remote viewing/harassment unit. Or it may be some other group of evil people with assumed real "psychic powers" sufficiently strong to cause the reported effects. I call the model where both technological methods and natural psychic methods are employed the mixed model because it is a mixture of both the standard model and the natural model.
This brings up the main split that will be considered as an example in this article. Is it technology or some natural psychic phenomenon? As I have pointed out in the above links, for many purposes it does not matter and the conclusions are model independent. The standard model is pure technology. We know that it exists. Psychic phenomena strong enough for the voice-to-skull phenomena reported by victims, if it exists, must have been kept secret by a conspiracy lasting millennia. There are various other incongruities with the natural model, including "facts" which are missing their logical consequences and thus are suspect. (This is especially true where those consequences are subject to arbitrage or profit -- though that can also be a motive for secrecy.) The natural psychic model would require a "psychic mafia" holding for generations, including for children, adolescents, and old people on deathbeds. It would require some enforcement mechanism so that even the disaffected members would not reveal a conspiracy that was not there to help them at all.
As I have also pointed out, though, the standard model of pure technology exists right now. Thus, in the current world, the pure natural model is obsolete (if it ever held). Could you tell the difference? So we have either the standard model or a mixed model with both natural psychic effects and technological ones.
Exposing the technology helps to bring out the the concepts and the violations even in the unlikely case that the natural model holds and a weaponized "psychic space" is the source of some people's harassment. Thus the decision or conclusion to bring out the existence of the technology and its known history of abuses follows in both the standard model (directly) and the natural model (indirectly). [And is the right thing to do regardless, because of the victims still suffering and denied redress. Human rights are axiomatically model independent with regard to any model.]
Why consider the natural model?
Although it provides a very good example of multiple model reasoning, there are some good reasons for victims to avoid the psychic model altogether. It may be used as a psyop to distract from the technology -- even that which is known openly to exist. It may be used to deceive technology victims into thinking they are "just psychic" and that the torture is "natural" (which it is not in either model). It is hard to take a natural psychic model to court, and so justice would have to proceed on other channels. The very association may be (and at times has been) used to connotationally tar mind control victims and their human rights plight with the "kookiness" that psychic phenomena tend to be regarded with in our society.
The reasons I consider the natural model -- even though I think the evidence supports the standard model -- are as follows:

• It is how the technology would seem to unwitting victims. There could well be a standard model with a psyop of a natural psychic model built on top of it. That is, many people with MC technology used on them unwittingly may be fooled into thinking they are psychic and know nothing of "the man in the middle" or the technology.
• The concepts of "telepathy," etc., are very familiar to many people from books and movies. Many people are even familiar with thinking about things like nonconsensual psychic attacks on their minds. In this sense it provides a natural introduction to some elements of the subjective mind control experience, i.e., how it feels to a victim. (This empathy may then extend to real, technological victims of similar horrors.) Of course the differences also need to be sharply highlighted.
• If we assume the natural model is not "magic," then there is a physics and a brain mechanism involved. If so, then this biological system can be and almost surely has been reverse engineered. This actually increases the likelihood of the standard model (or mixed model under this assumption) in many ways.
• Taking a multiple model approach generally minimizes the chances of being surprised should things turn out differently than you supposed originally.
• Many people believe the natural model already, whether it corresponds to ground truth or not. Such people are potentially attractive victims to those testing the technology, so they should be alerted to that possibility.
• Some people may psychologically prefer the natural model and be unable to cope with the standard model because they cannot deal with the idea that other humans would essentially put them in a technological cow pasture to exploit and manipulate them.
Please do not forget that the technology does exist and whatever the status of the "natural model" there are technological MC victims. Finally, there is something I call algorithm generica. This algorithm allows you to generalize or reason by analogy across models. It is amazing how much reasoning -- if you do the real, hard reasoning -- carries over to other models from thinking about a particular model. Whole subtrees remain essentially intact, to use the tree analogy. Generica is a bitch, as I say.

Reasoning around uncertainties

In reasoning it is important to know as much as you can, but also to keep in mind what you do not know. Many people know a little that some others do not, but think they know much more than they actually do. Model independent reasoning allows you to take uncertainties into account and find that, for some conclusions, what you do not know does not matter. What you know is enough. Of course this depends on your choosing the models correctly and covering all the possibilities. Bad data or deceptive data can be worse than no data: set a reasonable threshold and toss the garbage.
This ends the introductory part of the article. The remainder is a less structured collection of ideas and questions. If fully developed the above ideas would lead to a whole book, at least. These paragraphs hint at what that might look like. Victims in such situations probably do not need it all spelled out. And as the saying goes also, some horses start at the shadow of a whip. The main purpose of this article is to get the information out to those it may help. I mainly deal with "telepathy," natural or synthetic, by which voices and other audio productions are sent to victims in a voice-to-skull manner and whereby the victims' inner subvocal speech is transmitted out to others.

General Concepts in Synthetic Telepathy Models


Recall that an RTI is a realtime idiot, and is like a DJ at a radio station you are forced to listen to constantly and cannot turn down. They can access your private thoughts and harass you with this fact in their "broadcast." An AP is an autopig, which is an AI-like machine or expert system doing the job of an RTI. The combination is similar to a DJ playing taped segments between live segments.
Model neutral decisions. Rather than being completely model independent, some decisions are model neutral. This means that they hold in some models but for the other models they do not make any difference one way or another.
The third ear. This is a useful way of considering auditory phenomena not coming from the ears (or coming to the ears in a disguised way, where such a send is not apparent; certain known devices are capable of doing this). It is nothing but a sixth sense, whether it is natural or artificial. Even if it is a brain implant, it is essentially just like an additional sense organ. If you would not believe something sent to your real ears, why would you believe it if it were sent to your third ear without your consent? Partly this is because of denial of the phenomenon and the fact that people tend to confuse such signals with their own inner verbal thought processes. The modulation of such speech signals is typically pathological lies meant to harass, distract, and manipulate victims. Some such applications are subtle, while others are the blunt Chinese water torture of constant harassment. In the nonconsensual case, it is just like if Ewen Cameron forcibly strapped headphones onto your real ears and forced you to listen to harassing or manipulating audio 24 hours a day.
New term. The Cameron number of an autopig phrase (or RTI phrase) is the number of times it has been repeated. When a phrase has a large Cameron number it tends to become a strongly conditioned phrase (SCP). This essentially causes a form of brain damage to the victim. There is a tendency to hear such a phrase even when only vaguely similar phrases are heard, both on the third ear and through the actual ears.
Network structure of the communications channel. What we are dealing with in an abstract sense is a communications channel. The fact that it is often nonconsensual does not change this. The nodes of such a network are people, both perpetrators and victims. Some nodes might also be machines with AI-types of monitoring or harassment software. There is such a network structure in all models, though the exact details will vary. Considering questions of network details helps in fitting the data you gather to a particular model, though beware that psyops are intended to purposely conceal the real, underlying structure. These are some things to consider:
• Local vs. regional vs. global. Is there a spatial component? I.e. do people nearby tend to send or receive more strongly than those far away? Note that local interactions tend to be more noticeable than larger-scale ones because you have more direct feedback from individuals. More distant realtime spatial feedback might come from live radio or TV, for example, or a long-distance phone call. I have noticed a strong non-local component in my situation, but there may be a local component also that is partially masked by this. Of course a global or regional effect also tends to be local.
• Send power vs. receive power. Do some on the network send more strongly than they receive (i.e. more volume)? Do some receive more strongly than they send (i.e. more sensitive to weak signals)?
• "Control" or "consent" status. Do some nodes on the network have more control over the data they send or receive than others, such as an on-off switch or volume control? Are some witting versus others that are unwitting?
• Spatial distribution of senders and receivers. If there is a spatial component, what is the geographic distribution of people with the various send vs. receive parameters?
• Audience model. Is there a silent "audience" larger than the direct participants, the equivalent of Usenet lurkers? In the case of harassment, do they enjoy the "rape show," just tolerate it, or work to help the victims?
• Subnetworks. If there are localized subnetworks (or spatial regions, assuming a spatial component), are there different "cultures" within such subnetworks? Might harassment occur on one subnetwork, silent monitoring occur on another, and maybe even something useful and consensual on another?
On the notion of subnetworks, there are several ways such can arise. Note that they need not be completely isolated from each other, just clusters of higher connectivity. As an example, if the effect had a spatial component then spatial subnetworks would arise. They might also arise even within a spatial region. For example, if a frequency-specific nonthermal EM effect were responsible and people varied with respect to what frequencies they "sent" and responded to most strongly (according to their physiology and perhaps learning effects).
Psychic suppression units. If you assume a mixed model -- or even a weaponized pure natural model -- might there be the psychic equivalent of cointelpro? Control freaks seek out any channel for control and manipulation of individuals and groups. How might a "groupmind" be affected by manipulating or torturing a few select individuals? How might political murders or discrediting campaigns be carried out? What sort of economic exploitation would be possible?
Ground truth is the correct model. Keep in mind that the real "audience" and "perpetrators" are only those specified by the correct model (which is unknown). In conditionally evaluating any model, keep in mind what assumptions are assumed true within the model. This can avoid some fuzzy confusions across models which can tend to occur.
Ultimately internal, though also work on the external. Your reactions and response to mind control of this sort is ultimately internal. In some models you cannot ever "turn off" the signal without externally turning off or blowing up the machine responsible. (Shielding is another possibility, but there has been no reported long-term success in blocking the signals.) This is like if Ewen Cameron forcibly put earphones on your real ears that you could not remove. You would have to hear the sound. In other models such as certain EM models you might be able to modify your brain's response to "tune out" the sounds. In either case, you need to internally adjust your own response to understand and either tune out or ignore the incoming assault. With the Cameron earphone sorts of models this is difficult, and the conditioning will take its toll, but that is what you have to work with until external actions can change the external situation. It may help some victims to work on their ability to focus their attention on two or more places at once, though of course such divided attention tends to cause performance degradation.
Psychosexual torture. Torturers very often tend to focus on sex. This is the equivalent of torturers in a Central American country attaching electrodes to victims' genitals and shocking them. This is a very common sort of thing among torturers. Why is that? Here are a few possible reasons:
• Violating the victims' sexual organs is intended to demean the victims. The torturer displays the power to strip the victim of the ordinary sorts of societal expectations of privacy. Because the genitals are typically private, exposing and assaulting them may cause a real (though undeserved) sense of shame in the victims. The torturer makes clear that the victim is a 2nd class citizen at best, not deserving of the cultural norms, social mores, and social compact of "real" citizens. The sadistic violator wants to also be a prude, and exploit such societal expectations while violating them at an almost unthinkable level. They'll harass people until they destroy their private sex lives, while the culture peddles Viagra to the public to sell people a sex life again.
• Torturers, at least the lowest-level lackey torturers who carry out the actual physical deeds, tend to be sadists. (Those at higher levels tend to be amoral and conscienceless, treating people as worthless fodder, but tend not to want to get their hands dirty or have anything to do with the victims directly.) Sadists focus on genitals because it increases the terror and trauma to the victim, but also because it increases their thrill with the act of torture.
• People are infatuated with sex, and love to titter and gossip about it. Thus sexual gossip and smears put out in a whispering campaign will tend to spread.
Similar sorts of reasoning hold for other sorts of privacy violations flaunted to the victim, including the violation of the privacy of the victim's mind (which also is the primary sexual organ, or so sex therapists would tell us).
In all models: Adult torturers teach children or young adults how to torture and thus perpetuate the cycle of atrocities and repression.
General Observations
The following are more of my observations of the techniques that certain mind control torturers employ.
As I wrote in my essay "Excuses and Manipulations in Mind Control," torturers will first torture a victim for whatever reason. Usually because they thought a victim was vulnerable or they could get away with it. They will later concoct various "reasons" and "rationalizations" for why they did it. These often tend not to be even sensical on the surface level, but are employed in the subtext and on the trigger level. This both keeps the conspiracy informed of how to "rationalize" the atrocities and keeps the victims traumatized and in "dismay fatigue."
It is systematic, brutal as hell, and organized. There are large numbers of people who run the operations in what can only be described as a supremacist sense. A bunch of lilliputians who conspire and use their secret torture conspiracy to keep others down. Something like the conspiracy that tried to keep men like Paul Robeson down even though the people involved were several orders of magnitude his lessers.
How large a population is conditioned and propagandized unwittingly by the same people involved in the mind control operations? Either by widespread or wide-field mind control methods or by the standard propaganda and cointelpro methods?
In the space of the third ear there may be multiple voices. These might all be one machine programmed to distract and manipulate. They may be some bunker RTIs, often "enhanced" with autopig machines like radio DJs running taped announcements between live segments. In a model containing the natural psychic model as a submodel, or in a standard model with interconnected groups (perhaps deceived by a psychic psyop), these voices may represent individual, real people. Some are overtly machinelike, repeating Cameron phrases with numbing, annoying, and damaging regularity. Others actually say new things from time to time -- though one that can string together two sentences in succession is rare. Occasionally you even get one that can "converse." Thus far they invariably refuse to respond to the protocol authentication challenge of "what is the cosine of xxxx in radians to six digits after the decimal." (That allows a hard confirm of a true external and a rough authentication.) Note that even in the standard model there can be different groups -- perhaps different intelligence agencies -- on the same channel and accessing the same victims. Whatever the ground truth, the voices are not all pushing the same agenda and some argue with others. How to interpret this is model-dependent, but in a mixed model or certain "psychic psyop" standard models there may be some halfway semi-decent people on the channel (who still maintain the conspiracy used to torture). Or it may all be a good Nazi, bad Nazi act.
One game that voices in collusion play is the "false defender" game, a variant of good Nazi, bad Nazi. The bad Nazi will harass and goad and a good Nazi will seem to defend the victim. But the "defense" assumes all the phony premises of the bad Nazi and treats an illogical, harassing pig as a regular "person" whose idiotic babble is worth serious consideration.
In the space of autopigs and RTIs there are several sorts of processes I have not listed before. They are:
• Distraction autopig. Like a cointelpro agent they want to distract from any thought they deem "subversive." They also just generally distract like a Bergeron pulse, interfering with anyone trying to seriously think. They often tend to use sex-type distractions such as "sex with an underage girlfriend" or the more graphically repugnant "sex with a 10 year old." These distractions seem to occur more frequently if the voice-space "conversation" tends toward any dissent... They mainly just distract victims trying to think or get any work done.
• Platitude boy is a new named AP-RTI which repeatedly spews some common cliche or platitude.
• Logical negation boy just parrots the logical negation of anything you think. Sort of like a 5-year old: "It is x," "No, it is not x."
• The echo repeats your thoughts, for whatever reason or motive or intention.
• Timid boy always tries to induce anxiety or doubt in something you think or say. "You made a big mistake." "I warned you."
• Beavis and Butthead are two babbling morons who think they are the Marv Alberts of the rape show. They provide their running commentary of anything you think (or even dream) as filtered through their idiotic awareness. They were actually named by some other "voices" who also seemed annoyed by their incessant babble. They constantly harass and attempt to demean. If any of the "underground bunker" sorts of models hold, these two sound like they are sitting in a booth down there with microphones and headsets, harassing.
• A babbler is a process that just babbles seemingly random, non-connected words -- usually at a level just perceptible. It may be part of a trigger search algorithm, looking for what you react to. It is similar to the techniques used in technologies like the Russian acoustic psycho-correction devices now owned by a Richmond company.
• The usual tiresome processes "listen" to whatever you are thinking about and babble about them. If your thought included the word "Volkswagen," for example, the AP-RTI would then essentially let x="Volkswagen" and plug that value into several of the AP phrases of one variable. It is really syntax-level stuff, often not even making sense. They also repeat the AP phrases without variables constantly.
The ugly distorting mirror. You think a fraction of some thought. Before you can even finish the thought train, it is telemetered out to some filthy rapist. This rapist first interprets your half-thought in terms of his or her own idiot awareness. This distorted, ugly reflection is then sent back at you as if it somehow represents your whole thought. Besides the basic miscomprehension of the raped thought, the return signal also reflects the purposeful, sadistic intention to harm you and cause trauma. This external kneejerk can derail your normal thought train easily if you let it. If you think like a moron you'll be a moron. (Your internal kneejerks and conditioned thought habits can be hard enough to deal with without some external idiot's hateful reflection also imposed on you.)
Garbage in. If you have a filth channel coming in, you will have some filth associations. That is just the nature of the brain. That specifically refers to the third ear, but also applies to newspapers, TV, etc. Understand how the thought arises. Observe. It does not reflect on you. The best and most useful brain circuits, when fed trash and filth, will tend to produce trash and filth. Don't spin your wheels on worrying about this crap. Observe and stay aware and unperturbed. The pigs, if they are real people, are revealing their own filthy selves and minds. Point that out to any "audience" in whatever model you are assuming. I change models like I change a pair of pants. You do not have to explain. I am wearing blue jeans now.
Kick you in the leg till you limp, then blame you for limping. They'll torture you for a year and then "blame" you for thinking like a torture victim. Similarly for all years thereafter. They'll autopig you with a phrase 100,000 times and then blame you for tending to think that phrase. They also rush to both reinforce and ridicule any such tendencies. After a phrase becomes strongly conditioned, even a snippet of it or a similar rhythm can tend to set it off. The victim will anticipate hearing it, because he or she has been conditioned to expect it after so many occurrences.
One common thought occurrence is for a random noise on any ear to trigger a strongly conditioned phrase (SCP). Even just the anticipation of such an event is seized upon by an RTI-AP to mock, goad, and reinforce the SCP. The mind rapists also seem to be able to access the "pre-subvocal area" and see you forming an idea there. Even if you choose not to subvocalize it, they will often pick up pieces of it for their harassment. You can test this by barely thinking something but not even subvocalizing it, and quietly observe what happens. You can sometimes even "lead" the voices that way. Triggers and SCPs tend to work two ways even between torturer and torture victim, and barely thinking an SCP is more likely to set off the particular RTI or AP whose phrase it is. In an AI sense it seems something like a blackboard system running off of your brain data. (Keep in mind the effect of conditioned internals here, though.)
Stockholm syndrome is induced by forced intimacy plus abuse and torture. With third ear Cameron harassment directly into the brain this can happen if you are not careful. After years of abuse, they'll pretend to be your "friends." Like the bait and babble and bait and trigger, this is only to get you to pay attention and open up to the next traumatic brain insult.
The trigger search algorithm. This algorithm repeats with mind numbing regularity. The RTI-APs are not called idiots for nothing, but one thing they are good at is spotting any sort of reaction to their goading and babbling. This is especially true of any sort of trauma or distress reaction. They notice this like a pack of jackals sensing a wounded animal. They home in on it instantly. Any sort of perceived weakness quickly draws their attentions. Anything they notice you responding to is likely to be sent to the trigger search algorithm for "testing." They also repeat the trigger search algorithm at periods of, say, 30 minutes, 1 hour, and often 1 day and several days later. If the test "succeeds" then you get a new autopig phrase goading you long-term. They also watch as you read things and go about your daily life for anything that might get a reaction or be associated with a traumatic situation. Some of these paths like newspapers and radio are also employed deliberately as feedback pathways in trying to trigger or goad the victim.
Professional triggerers. The RTIs and their AP machines are the lowest-level sorts of Brownshirt harassers and goaders. They are the useful idiots for others behind the scenes. They constantly harass to annoy and weaken the victim. They drip, drip, drip, like water torture. In the background there are also what I call professional triggerers. They will lurk in the background or be called up when the victim needs extra suppressing. They trigger based on a long history and profile of the victim, and quite pointedly. You can even sometimes hear them directing the lower-level harassers as to the "theme" of the next harassment skit. I call one of these "Major Mengele Psych Degree."
Why are spies called spooks? They are called spooks because they are spooky, or at least try to be. That is their first line of operation. They want to intimidate with a bare, deniable hint of blackmail, for example. They want to scare you, intimidate you, or confuse you in a way they can deny and that others will not pick up on -- "you must be crazy." They also bluff and lie constantly, and create various deceptions which they then try to market to their targets. They want to induce anxiety and uncertainty in their targets, and alter their courses of action from what the spooks at least imagined it would otherwise be.
In anything you read there tends to be the text, the subtext, and the subsubtext. Like with harassing audio, harassing and smearing subtext tends toward playground level stuff -- though applied and implied by supposed adults. The subsubtext represents the underlying intention of the subtext and the deeper implied message. It tends to be picked up by those used to "reading the tea leaves" as opposed to only picking up bits of the basic smears directly between the lines. Keep in mind that all the subtexts tend to be BS; people can lie between the lines more deniably than on them.
An Example Model
The remainder of this article presents a particular hypothetical model scenario as an extended example.
As an exercise, assume the unlikely case of the purely natural model. Assume that some subset of people are born with some natural ability as "hearers." Assume they have managed to keep this situation secret for centuries via a strong taboo and mafia-like omerta. Assume that even children with such abilities somehow know not to talk about it, and that attempts to write about it or tell people meet with suppression. Assume also that there are some people who are naturally strong "senders." Assume that strong "senders" in many cases do not even know that they have this somewhat rarer gift/curse. How would they know, if they do not "hear" and the hearers keep it a secret? The "hearers" participate in a conspiracy which is used to keep the unwitting "senders" vulnerable and exploitable. Suppose that, besides just listening, exploiting, raping, and peeping at these "senders," some of the "hearers" decide to have sadistic fun with them. These "senders" are harassed and driven crazy if even a few "hearers" decide for whatever reason they do not like them or just want to. They may be driven to suicide or may be driven to the waiting arms of psychiatry where they are drugged into being zombies.
Perhaps these "senders" are even just like the "hearers" except that they are the equivalent of deaf people exploited worse than any freak show "entertainers." Suppose this mafia-like conspiracy is widespread and uses triggers and other such techniques to maintain control of those not in on the secret -- as well as to police its own members. These triggers would develop over the years until they were almost stylized caricatures of the "best" triggers that the harassing jackals finally homed in on. Like a pathetic word or symbol representing how to put down any particular person and which even children could use -- never mind if it is stupid or reveals atrocities on actual inspection. The victims tend to be dismayed at the stupidity and the evidence of widespread conspiracy against them, more than the actual pathetic triggers. Not all such "hearers" would actually be Nazis in this model -- though collaborator is close. In fact the majority might even be like the "good people" who did nothing even as they heard the cries from the death camp down the street.
If a "sender" also had some "hearing" ability, or developed it over the course of time, he or she might not know how to interpret it. If harassment had already started, this would be just one more harassment feedback path to the victim. A way to manipulate and goad the victim. The victim might think it was technology because such technology does indeed exist. Alternately, technology might be used for a "send" to the victim, while the victim's natural "send" ability would be used for the return "hearing" feedback path from the victim. The victim would be traumatized, angry, suspicious, and confused, not knowing what was happening.
How does this model meet with the facts? What inconsistencies and unlikelihoods does it have? How well does it explain what mind control victims report experiencing, such as going into a library and having people snickering at them and goading them with their own "private" thoughts? If the "senders" knew that they tended to send more strongly, wouldn't they be in an interesting position. How could "senders" ever learn to control and use their abilities if they never got any feedback but harassment? What psyops could create the illusion that this model holds? What "experiments" could a victim or other person conduct to support this model over another one, in the face of psyops and deception ops? What if a "sender" gradually became a "hearer" too, even under harassment? Could it be distinguished from a technological "send" to the victim? Assuming this model holds, how could a victim knowing this ground truth best deal with the harassment and come to uncondition himself or herself from the pathetic triggers and ongoing harassment?
If the natural model is not magic, how does the advance of technology play into things? Are there any curves crossing or about to cross? How does the new mixed model, with the standard model thrown in, change things? Everyone has a cell phone these days, and soon they'll be so tiny people will mount them on their heads or affix them to their bodies (neurophone-phone?). That is a consensual sort of network essentially like the ones discussed in this article. Even the open, non-secret technology related to synthetic telepathy is advancing rapidly.
Consider the above model, in both its strong points and weak points. Think about the supporting data and possible experimental design. This is a useful exercise in any case, both to practice thinking in terms of conditional models and because parts will generalize to the mixed models and standard models. Generica is a bitch.

Mental Health Watchdogs

Official CCHR International website & blog featuring medical experts/information on psychiatric diagnosis, psychiatric drugs, informed consent, consumer rights related to mental health and alternative medical solutions for treating problems of attention, learning, behavior and mood. CCHR is a non-profit mental health watchdog organization.

http://www.cchrint.org/about-us/

Psychic Powers and Mind Control

Psychic Powers and Mind Control
Sidebar to Part III: Mental Firewalls and Models of Synthetic Telepathy
Allen Barker, Feb. 17, 2002

There are a good number of people in society who think they have psychic powers. Even though a psychiatrist might call this schizotypal, or perhaps a belief in special powers, that is only the bad religion of psychology. The truth is that no one really knows. From my point of view people can hold whatever religious beliefs or beliefs about the world that they choose to hold. I personally do not believe it, but there is a small chance that there are some of what are called "psychic" powers. I think, though, that people often do not understand their own intuition and the nature of time. That and an old-fashioned Nazi conspiracy explain what I see in the world. Given that plenty of decent people hold the view that there truly are psychic powers, though, this sidebar is about how that relates to mind control. Please understand that the issues of technological mind control do not go away or really change according to whether or not there are "natural" psychic powers.
First of all, psychic powers and ESP are the perfect psyop distractions from mind control. You rape someone's brain all the while telling him or her that it is a "natural phenomenon." If the victim buys it, you have a cooperating, though duped, subject. A victim who complains of electronic harassment and surveillance might be dismissed by some as just a "psychic harassment victim." Besides acting as a distraction from the issues of people being tortured, talk about psychic phenomena serves to discredit those who do so publicly. This is because of the ridicule that goes along with the subject among those who decide what others are allowed to think. Another very important point is that psychic phenomena can serve as a cover lie for the testing of electronic and other mind control weapons, devices, and techniques. That may make the population of people who think they have psychic powers especially vulnerable to the predators who scour the domestic population for human beings to test weapons on.

Let me assume, for the remainder of this sidebar, that there are some psychic phenomena and consider what follows from that. Consider a form of weak telepathy, for example. We know it is either weak or else there is a huge conspiracy of psychics trying to hide their powers. Consider the authentication protocol from the main essay, "What is the cos(1999)." Suppose Joe across town is psychic. Can he not receive such a simple message and manage to transmit back four digits? I have not seen any evidence of any such useful or verifiable information. I can easily send the same message in email, though, and soon will be able to have a device in my eyeglasses to do it from anywhere. But an interesting point which arises is that at the abstract, mathematical level both "natural" and technological methods of telepathy or remote knowledge work out about the same. We're only haggling implementation and strength. The basic nature of the human mind and communication stay the same, as do in fact most experimental techniques one might use to test for either.

Clandestine mind control research should concern psychics even more than ordinary citizens. Many psychics would like some scientific proof of the existence of such phenomenon. But when Nazis are on the rampage with technological methods of mind control, such experiments are essentially worthless. The experimental design has not ruled out such technological interference, influencing the results either one way or the other.

On a more sinister note, it is naive to assume -- if there truly are useful and powerful psychic powers -- that the secret government labs have not been all over them for years. The black budget labs would have dissected all sorts of "psychics" by now, making measurements all the time in order to technologically mimic what the psychic accomplishes. It is not magic. It may not be describable by current "open" physics but it is not magic. So if we suppose it is not magic then one has to wonder what sort of progress has been made in secret and how that knowledge is being used. What if it were politically desirable to "jam the psychics," to keep them from thinking in their natural mode of thought? The human brain can only put out less than a watt or so of power. The outlets in your home deliver far more power, and a secret transmitter somewhere could put out gigawatts. (And does electropollution have any bearing on this?)

Suppose that even more progress was made than just finding the mode of transmission and a method for jamming it. Suppose the actual modulation method of such transmissions were discovered, as well as how to generate them. Then what you have is a bunch of people hardwired to receive relatively weak transmissions which go straight to the core of the psyche. What better mind control method? It was already there in the first place, it just had to be hijacked by Nazis and employed against the natural psychic community. You would end up with the usual "natural" psychic signals but with a stronger technological signal superimposed over it. A technician wearing a psychic amplifier (or with such a device implanted) could outpower all the natural psychics.

Taking this a step further, a government could deploy its new hypothetical EWAR psychic phenomena detectors to track down the sources of psychic emissions. These would be human beings, of course, with the equivalent of a GPS lock on their body's location. Their thoughts could be read technologically -- any that went out on the "psychic channel" at least. This data could then be placed on a worldwide computer network, stored in a database, or processed in any other way that data can be processed. Natural psychics would also "hear" any technological broadcasts that mimicked the psychic signals they had the "gift" to be able to receive. What a setup for exploitation...

Even if we consider that the "mystical method of psychic transmission" has not been, or maybe even cannot be analyzed and reverse engineered into technology, there is still the issue of the weaponization of psychic space to deal with. It is no secret that governments have researched this area for some time, perhaps as more than just a psyop distraction. Some of the details of things like "remote viewing" that have come out are ridiculous, like where a subject is given a seemingly random integer "coordinate" and somehow knows what location that corresponds to here on the rotating earth spinning through the solar system. (Perhaps the integer is really the label of the technological experiment being conducted...) But let me continue to assume that there is some real natural phenomenon there.

Those who torture human beings by utilizing psychic space are every bit as bad as those who would do it with technology. One can hope that some more mystical spaces can take care of themselves, for example that the threefold law would be descriptive of what happens to those who use psychic space to inflict harm. Nonetheless, if that law ever once held it may need some extra help these days.
That is about all I have to discuss on the issue of psychic phenomena, so I will end with a list of a few things I ponder sometimes when I assume the hypothesis that "natural" psychic phenomena are real.

• Are natural psychics afraid to talk about the experiences? "Hey, I just heard someone think X, did anyone else? Send or receive?" A few people discuss such things but if the phenomena were widespread then that leaves many people not talking. Is there a conspiracy of idiots? Are some people unwitting psychics, perhaps not consciously or verbally in touch with it?

• Why can't even two psychics, a sender and a receiver, put on a convincing, statistically significant demonstration? Surely two out of however many there are would be amenable to scientific testing and the advancement of knowledge. A double-blind card reading/guessing experiment should do it, modulo any external technological interference. Do the other, conspiracy-of-silence psychics always know what is going on and jam such efforts?

• How strongly spatial or distance-based are such phenomena? What is the usual radius of effect, and what is the maximum? Is there the usual bell curve of abilities in this realm also? How does ability change with age? Is sending different from receiving? Can training affect either? How can a person block such a channel at a time when he or she does not consent to it? If such phenomena exist, why can't you go to the library and find credible answers to these questions?

• Could some people act as "repeaters," spreading a wave across a population?

• What about the people locked up in mental wards because they claimed their thoughts were being broadcast or that they could pick up telepathic messages? Are some of these people really psychic? Wouldn't that be a human rights violation? Does no one care?

• What a luxury it would be to worry just about natural psychic phenomena if you were under technological electronic harassment.

• Just like with a wide-field technological device sending to many people, would you know if you were sending or receiving? Would you know if the guy next to you was sending or receiving, or if you were both receiving the same signal?

• If psychic phenomena do exist, does time have any bearing in that domain like we expect? How would you know it is not a dead person or a person from the future you are connecting with?

• Wouldn't it be presumptuous to get a little psychic glimpse of someone's mind and think you really knew anything about them or what their thoughts meant or what they were going through?

• If the "power to read men's minds" is so valuable, why does the psychic work stocking shelves in a department store? Not that that isn't valuable and honorable work, but why not poker championships? Why not other applications of the talent?

• If only certain people's minds can be read, perhaps it is their talent to "transmit thoughts into your mind" rather than yours to "read men's minds."

• Doesn't it seem like a connection such as a psychic link would make people more compassionate and empathetic?

• Could the people in Nazi Germany hear the psychic cries of a room full of men, women, and children being gassed to death in what they were told was going to be a shower? Did the slaveowners have psychic connections with the slaves they degraded and demeaned each day? Were they entertained? Disgusted? What did they feel?