Essential Quotes

I have sworn on the altar of God eternal hostility against every form of tyranny over the mind of man.
Thomas Jefferson

Friday, July 09, 2010

Censoring The Truth ..........

This article contains discussion of genuine human/democratic rights and civil
liberties abuses with a focus on the restrictions to justice and individual freedom
occurring whenever and wherever the truth is suppressed.
Firstly, it must be said that because influential criminals do control not only the
bulk of the worlds wealth but also the more effective methods of information transfer
(and personal expression) it is possible for them to severely limit peoples choices through
censorship of the truth. For example, if a defence department (or one of its contractors)
wants to develop an invention with a military application they get the government to
place a secrecy order on it thereby gaining exclusive development rights and preventing
the public from speculating on how it could be misused. Anyone attempting to expose
the truth will then be covertly victimised, maybe even institutionalized. Also, to silence
any wealthy/influential members of the community who may have an attack of
conscience over the matter they use national security legislation, defamation laws, threats
of scandals etc. It’s all very neat, tight and totally undemocratic, allowing well-placed
villains to dictate to us all. In fact secrecy orders are there to help governments to hide
their crimes.
Another example relates to vital information connecting MP’s with vested interest
groups (affiliations, contributions, secret deals and so on). As a result the public is
frequently hoodwinked by politicians and those that direct them. Accordingly, the
voting, lobbying and protesting decisions that people make are often badly skewed
because they are not in possession of all the facts. So, instead of governments being truly
open and representative of the general population they usually reflect elitist attitudes on
how society should be run and make decisions that favour the influential few. The rest of
us are patronized with rhetoric and lies, being expected to trust people who are clearly not
worthy of our trust. The systems of accountability (including the media) are inadequate
and corrupt. MP’s don’t represent the people just because they’re from the people, yet
they should represent their views and ideals. Unfortunately democracy (government by
the people) has become a remote notion not based in reality. It’s only talk. Equally, the
media don’t inform the public or represent community standards on many issues; instead
they harass and ostracise those that do; (refusing to even confront them lest their
consciences be threatened by the truth). The barrier is placed there by agencies.
Our best solutions lie with our willingness to be open to the absolute truth and our
demands that it be given to us. Only total disclosure will suffice as those entrusted with
power are usually untrustworthy; abusing authority, opportunity and ability to make
secret matters that belong in the public domain.
The simple truth is that wealthy criminals (who are above the law) control our
natural resources, our financial institutions, our media outlets, our government
beaurocracies, the spy networks and much much more. Most importantly they control the
flow of information through the media which they also use to control/intimidate their
opponents. Lies, rumours, half-truths, beat-ups, selective photography, selective
wording, editing and more keep public figures under thumb as they realise they can be
destroyed by their secrets and publicly denigrated… Many public figures are involved in
shady financial dealings, have drug habits, are involved in prostitution, gambling scams
and so on which all facilitate this. As for non public figures, covert harassment
techniques and degradation are used because even if they had something to hide they
normally couldn’t use it on them publicly as such people have no public profile.
So what do they censor, exactly? Certainly not explicit media sex and violence,
profanity, lies, brainwashing material or anything else that generates big dollars. No,
what they censor is the ugly truth about serious criminal activity that benefits very
wealthy criminals and power brokers. We get part of the story when it’s convenient or
can’t be hidden but usually we get nothing. I’ll save discussion of advanced weapons and
spying for later but a few examples follow…
A crisis, like the current Middle East situation, can be easily kicked off (or pushed
along) by government agents (military or otherwise) who set up an atrocity (a murder or
act of terrorism), often to pin the blame on the enemy i.e. they’ll even kill their own
people to stir up a conflict. The stirrers then retaliate to the atrocity; gaining for their
masters the financial rewards they originally sought. The stirrer’s reaction is backed by
the public who only see the scenario from one angle; the one they’re fed by the media.
So while the whole thing is stage-managed, from acts of madness through to the eventual
peace negotiations, profits are made by the guilty whilst the cost for the innocent is often
death. Likewise for the not so innocent (but duped) pawns who are motivated to fight in
the name of religious/cultural hatred, the results can be catastrophic. Those guinea pigs
can even be subjected to torture/death courtesy of experimental weaponry which is trialed
during such times. And any discussion of such problems in oral or written forms
(including entertainment) can be stifled via covert censorship and corruption.
Most rock stars and models, many sport stars, MP’s and journalists as well as
numerous “artists”, businessmen and other public “actors” are guilty of substance abuse.
The public knows this but not the full extent of the problem. It’s rampant. They also do
not know of the connections between celebrities with “personal health” problems and
those that compromise them over it. Aside from the obvious lack of character evident,
because these people are monitored and blackmailable, they are also more likely to be
coerced into other criminal conduct. As with drugs, the same can be said of any other
criminal act that public figures have committed or been lured into by association; such as
media surveillance feedback etc. And it must be remembered that it’s a crime to fail to
render assistance, to associate with criminals, to criminally harass or to be an accessory
before, during or after the fact re any crime.
Where public figures cannot be silenced and will not cooperate they can be
publicly humiliated (over something as simple as an “arranged” traffic fine), killed or
anything in between. The assassinations usually occur only where the whistle is about to
be blown publicly on something serious. Dupes can take the blame or it can be called an
accident or a suicide etc but the fact is that the agencies and organised crime groups are
usually behind it. For example, programmed assassin John Chapman was targeted with
neurophone-based technology; transmitting voices into his head. These voices said God
was instructing him to kill John Lennon then turn himself in. As a result the album
Lennon was working on was never released, not even in an edited form. I wonder what
he would’ve said about the developments of the last 20 years. Very convenient.
NB This sort of thing helps to scare other public figures into compliance and
prevents them from helping victims of agency abuse.
Similarly, though less seriously, other outspoken peace advocates can be vilified,
banned and so on just for opposing warfare. Notice how few celebrities have spoken out
about the wars in Afghanistan, Iraq, Lebanon etc as opposed to the number protesting
Vietnam. And I don’t accept that conscription was the sole reason for protest back then.
People now are too afraid or apathetic to care and those that do… well (for e.g.) the
members of the group “Dixie Chicks” suffered abuse for openly opposing the latest Iraqi
war and few others dared open their mouths until recently when the US governments
stance softened enough to allow open objections to be raised.
Quite obviously, to harass anyone for holding an opinion is wrong (unless they’re
promoting criminal activity) yet the innocent are often silenced while the guilty carry on;
promoting death and destruction for ulterior motives. The media misrepresent the truth
(and the “players”) on the world stage because they are corruptly controlled, like the
MP’s, businessmen etc. All too often the truth is censored and a stage-managed show
takes its place. The public dutifully lap it up. And in the case of arranged murders not
even the victims closest, most influential friends or family are willing or able to air their
concerns publicly.
E.g. In the early ‘90’s NSW state police Special Branch held criminal files on
numerous politicians and journalists but was unable to properly investigate the serious
political/corporate crimes involved; due to the “protected species” mentality surrounding
celebrities as well as the covert harassment they themselves endured (as police monitored
by criminals while they worked). Eventually, amid a flurry of discrediting media reports
(some maybe correct) the Special Branch unit was disbanded and all files destroyed by
the state government. Now, curiously, the corrupt MPs/journalists responsible for this
obliteration were amongst those believed to be guilty of the crimes mentioned in the files.
Funny that. Surely if having a few corrupt police in that unit meant that it needed to be
disbanded we should see parliamentary dissolutions and media reshuffles at regular
intervals since they’re no better. However, that’s not the case because they’re protected
by agency/criminal thugs and can do as they like.
NB As with everything I tell the reader this information is not based on mere
speculation, observation or even just personal experience but on actual information
supplied by those with direct knowledge and involvement. During 16 years of research,
I’ve spoken to 100’s of police, spies, military experts, journalists and political aides. For
example, well known journalists who helped including Mike Minehan (ex Ch 9, ACA),
Ross Saunders (ex Ch 2) and John Hill (ex Ch 10, News room supervisor). These were
amongst those that confirmed that media surveillance feedback and neurophone
technology harassment are common criminal practices effected by the media mafia and
the spy agencies. Nevertheless, if the reader wants the proof of any of the matters
discussed here to come from an “official source” you’ll be waiting forever; that’s the
whole point of this discussion… such information is secreted/censored and this sort of
article is the only place you’re going to get it.
As with most evil practices, wealth and power are the motivating factors behind
controlling people through censorship. Yet because brainwashing, mushrooming and
patronizing of the public doesn’t work on everyone “they” have their goons harass those
that still question their conduct and thereby pose a perceived threat to their criminal
empires. At the same time selection criteria and bastardization processes work to ensure
the cooperation of most employees in the spy agencies, the military, the police, the media
and government. Few will question what they’re told to read, do etc.
In fact most will not question any instructions that come from their bosses. Even within
groups of businessmen, loyalty to their superiors and/or their criminal “mates” is usually
put well before their duties to the general community. The bottom line (the end) justifies
the means in their criminal minds and society is expected to applaud them for it; as
always the criminal deludes himself by focusing on his results and ignoring his methods.
For e.g. How many times have we all endured politicians placing their primary
allegiances to their party and the party line, campaign contributors, wealthy socialites and
so on above the best interests of the general community courtesy of some secret deal that
favours the elite few at the expense of the majority. Being out of touch with the average
citizen (yet frequently in contact with wealthy criminals) MP’s delude themselves to the
point where some actually believe they have made the wisest moves; ignoring the
criminality behind it. The same can be said of thieves of intellectual property,
victimisers, drug cheats etc etc.
Again, those speaking the truth on such matters are ridiculed/silenced. In the case
of knowledgeable, authoritative or well known people (such as honest scientists, spies,
police or public figures) they can be set up for institutionalization or even death for just
thinking about blowing the whistle. Further examples of public figures who were clearly
killed were Hanse Cronje (cricketer, killed in a plane “accident” while working on a tellall
expose on match-fixing); similarly suspicious was the death of cricketer Bob
Woolmer; Grace Kelly (Princess/actress, killed in a car “accident” after ordering the
mafia to leave Monaco); Robert Kennedy (US AG, “assassinated” while fighting
organised crime); Diana Spencer (princess, killed in a car “accident” when proving an
embarrassment to the monarchy). The list goes on. There is also a real link between
prominent peace advocates and orchestrated assassinations. At the risk of laboring the
point, examples include John F Kennedy, Martin Luther King, Y. Rabin, A. Sadat and M.
Ghandi. All made popular, peaceful moves and comments that threatened powerful
criminals who profit from war/hatred etc. On each occasion there was more to the
incident than the actions of a lone, crazed murderer and the media know it, so why don’t
you… The media doesn’t wait for positive proof to speculate or comment about other
matters… No, it’s because such things are done on behalf of the military/media/business
conglomerate that rules the world and committed by agency (or agency provoked) goons.
Think about it… How many good people that strived (publicly) to “make the world a
better place” died peacefully in their dotage? Not many. Ask yourself why. Do you
think “they’re” going to tell you they do such things? No, they’d rather terrorise the
public with lies about terrorism, preventable crimes, illnesses and more to justify their
surveillance society (and reductions in civil liberties) and to occupy the public’s thinking
while powerful criminals do as they please. No, they’d rather “dumb down” the
population and keep them quiet. Our heads are filled with trivia and fairytales while the
ugly truth remains hidden.
So the problem is the fact that the mainstream media influences, if not totally
controls, what people know (and believe). They feign ignorance on some matters and lie
about others so others have to strive to spread the actual truth on matters including the
methods such people use to silence/discredit us. Meanwhile we quietly fight their
systems of secrecy and oppression. Unfortunately such is the power of the media that if
they told the public “the sun rises in the north” or even “God is an alien”, once such lies
were reinforced with corrupted evidence, for many, that would become the new truth.
There’s neither integrity nor sincerity in most of what they present and their greatest lies
are lies of omission.
As previously mentioned, National security laws, defamation actions, media
scandals, threats and more stop most influential people in their tracks. However, for
private citizens, who cannot be bought or intimidated, more covert methods are used
including high tech assaults from satellite/computer technology. Outspoken and
authoritative scientists, spies etc may actually be killed but such extremes are not
commonplace with others, though some victim’s suicide.
Firstly, whether you realise it or not, everyone has to endure total monitoring of
all telecommunications by the NSA’s satellites/computers. However, as well as this the
NSA, NRO, CIA etc spy on conversations, movements, writings and even brain waves.
Having nothing to hide provides no protection. It’s the monitors who have something to
hide and they target the innocent, leaving most of the guilty alone; to do their dirty work
for them.
Now privacy invasions are not the only means of harassment… For persons of
interest direct responses to private comments or actions can include sirens wailing,
choppers hovering, planes buzzing, operatives interfering in their lives and so on. This
can escalate to the infliction of debilitating pain/illness, psychological trauma, even
death… as a result of laser-facilitated, mostly satellite-based, psychotronic or directed
energy weapons. These are trained on targets as they’re tracked 24/7 by the government
agencies who use these technologies. These extreme methods are usually reserved for the
disempowered and non-connected. Regardless, the catalyst can be as innocuous as a
political comment or even expressing likes/dislikes regarding TV/radio etc. This is
because politics and the media are thoroughly protected operations and any “astute”
criticism of them is “discouraged”. This “discouraging” can be done even in the privacy
of the citizens residence. That practice is, of course, like all the criminal activities of the
government spy agencies, made a matter of National security and so remains a secret;
especially as 99% of the population would democratically object if they knew about it
(the other 1% are the criminals). In this way “National Security” effectively secures the
positions of well placed criminals while denying the rest of us our basic human rights
including the rights to privacy and freedom of expression. (It’s noteworthy that the U.S
haven’t even signed the optional protocol of the Covenant on Civil and Political Rights).
NB On top of all this there are methods of putting thoughts/words into peoples
heads using subliminal or audible neurophone-based technologies. Thoughts can also be
extracted and transferred using these, in conjunction with mind reading technologies i.e.
powerful computers take the results of satellite screening of the EMF/brain waves and
interpret them… then disseminate them to complicit players or dupes. In this manner
many targets field the words/thoughts/actions via “coincidences” that happen around
them and blame the wrong people (appearing paranoid and being thus discredited). In
reality many targets can be harassed at once by these methods.
In addition, all of the results of any satellite surveillance can be computer
transferred, and fed to numerous not so innocent agency “ghost” writers or any criminally
corrupt media outlet (as well as any operative or dupe) so that they can be intertwined
into presented material so as to subtlely/covertly humiliate, terrorise, destroy and
discredit targets. Many spies are in fact writers who place material into, speeches, news
items, ads, movies, songs etc. This, coupled with denial about this very common
practice, makes the victims angry/bewildered responses appear to be unprovoked and
therefore dangerously paranoid. The best response is therefore to do nothing although all
targets let off steam at times to cope with the constant harassment. Meanwhile the guilty
media identities , politicians, etc smugly present themselves to the public but secretly
treat them as somehow inferior and deserving of whatever lies/”entertainment” they
choose to feed them.
This leads me to the roles of other professionals (in the legal and medical
fraternities) who compound the problems by prostituting their skills with no regard for
justice or the truth. For example, psychiatrists in general are used to discredit those
victimised/silenced using covert methods by declaring that such things don’t happen
(because there’s no hard evidence). Also, psychiatrists working for agencies/mobsters
may suggest unnecessary treatment for those merely questioning powerful, well-placed
criminals. Some of the more corrupt in the “profession” even use the collected brain
wave patterns of victims (as “harassed or influenced”) and incorrectly correlate these
patterns with those of known criminals. NB Anyone targeted by mood management
technologies (et al) would be waging a constant mental battle with his/her tormentors
anyway but this doesn’t mean they are potential criminals. However, because the
tormentors have a criminal bent (and little self restraint) they cannot understand this so
they persist in trying to provoke normal law-abiding citizens. Occasionally they succeed
with real murderers, terrorists etc but it’s rare. Because most targets are chosen due to
their hatred of crime; they are difficult to provoke.
Again, on psychiatry it’s noteworthy that psychiatrists recommend “breeding out”
schizophrenia which is supposedly passed on but it’s really “ethic” cleansing that they’re
promoting. I subscribe to the view that psychiatry is a largely bogus profession/science
invented and promoted to be used against those who question the powers that be, those
who know too much and those presenting a social inconvenience. Most of its claims are
not based on proof or in scientific fact. On top of this the brutality and inhumanity
evident in the treatment of the (mostly experimental) victims is equaled only by the lies
and deception evident in the “doctors” diagnoses. Complicit pharmaceutical companies
are also a party to their crimes. Personally I’ve only had one encounter with a corrupt
psychiatrist and it was short-lived (10 mins) but I’ve spoken to many other victims. I
honestly believe that to claim that those outside a profession (be it psychiatry, politics,
journalism or whatever) aren’t in a position to criticize those within is a transparent,
defensive ploy aimed at restricting said criticism to whistleblowers. Observers from
outside are objective enough to pinpoint professional carelessness or criminal misconduct
within a profession and so their views must not be dismissed. Those within a profession
or political party or club or media outlet or any group for that matter will naturally be
reluctant to acknowledge corruption or fault whether through their own guilt or through
blind faith and self delusion.
· The world is dominated by secretive, powerful families including members of the
Illuminati, the mafia and other such groups. They use government spies and their
own goons to do their dirty work. They influence most governments,
beaurocracies and corporations by one method or another.
· Despite the mass media’s portrayal of spies as heroes, in reality most are
criminals involved in the monitoring/harassment/murder of innocent people.
They also infiltrate various writing roles intending to misinform and “dumb
down” the population.
· The mainstream media is controlled by organised crime, restricted and influenced
by government secrecy orders and centrally involved in the harassment of “dogooders”
with surveillance feedback and other criminal harassment. Independent
media outlets are marginalised; with insignificant audiences. Three quarters of
what’s newsworthy is never presented and what takes its place is largely trivia;
which we’ve been brainwashed to crave.
· There is enough food, water, clothing and shelter in the world for everyone but
greed restricts the access to it.
· Classified, military technologies exist which can cause people or objects
(including aircraft) to disappear or disintegrate, to levitate or deviate. They can
affect the weather. They can also torment, injure or kill remotely. Most of it is
laser-facilitated and satellite-based. It’s trialled during wars (e.g. in Iraq and
Lebanon) and on civilian targets (certain prisoners, psych inmates, peace
advocates, whistleblowers, banned writers etc). It’s illegal human
experimentation and it’s totally covered up.
· Secretive NSA/NRO satellite tracking and surveillance technologies monitor all
telecommunications (and more) worldwide. These are computer analysed and
stored. The NSA, CIA etc then intercept and use these along with the private face
to face conversations/actions of persons of interest. As with the technologies
mentioned below, NASA is primarily responsible for secretly delivering the
developed technologies into space. Their cover is space exploration and alien
searches which they successfully sell to the public as legitimate ventures.
· Technologies exist which allow voices, ideas, moods, pain etc to be delivered
personally to targeted individuals. These can be radio wave, microwave or
satellite laser delivered.
· The brain waves of many people are remotely monitored by satellite scanners and
interpreted courtesy of more super computers each of which process more
information than ten times the world’s total population. One day, when this
extends to the monitoring of everyone’s brain waves, we will all be linked, 24/7,
to the system in a futuristic, hellish computer state. To even think of challenging
the evils of the criminals that rule the world would then bring instant harassment
or death. So all dissent, all democracy will effectively end at that point. Without
public exposure this is inevitable.
· Because of the aforementioned electromagnetic technologies (et al), terrorism,
war and even serious local crime is all solvable if not totally preventable.
However, because such technologies generate money and control emotions and
their misuse excuses reductions in civil liberties etc you are not told about them.
They are not used for good, only evil. In other words, terrorism, war, crime etc,
suit the grand design of the globalists so they’re not going to alert the public to the
existence of the relevant technologies by using them to stop crime. Instead they
continue to be used to oppress ordinary, law-abiding citizens who dare to protest
(by whatever means) about the inequities/crimes of our systems and those
responsible for them. It’s all a black operation funded by criminal corporate
entities and protected by government secrecy provisions.
· Despite pathetic/defensive cries of “If it ain’t broke don’t try and fix it” from
those benefiting by maintaining the status quo, our less than perfect systems are
deliberately flawed in order to favour the criminals guiding them. People of
integrity who observe this are marginalised or eliminated so their voices cannot be
heard. Systems examples follow:
E.g. 1 THE LEGAL SYSTEM It’s inequitable and unjust, usually affording
people only the justice they can afford. In a fair society justice would not be a
commodity but a right. Consistency in verdicts and sentencing would then be the
E.g. 2 THE PENAL SYSTEM It’s barbaric; encouraging inequity, brutality
and inhumanity. It exposes inmates to drugs, homosexuality and more serious
offenders without the necessary protection of adequate segregation. It’s an
expensive solution when the only legitimate purpose of incarceration (in my
view) is prevention.
monitored, controlled and/or warped by organised crime figures and their spy
agency connections. This is the most crucial element in their censorship package.
They don’t lie about everything but they omit or warp the most crucial
information on the most important topics while filing our heads with lies or trivia.
The public’s right to know the truth is undeniable and should remain absolute.
Only criminals would manufacture reasons for secrecy on matters that are clearly
of concern to everyone. The worst cover up is the fact that the government spy
agencies commit heinous crimes with impunity. This is perhaps the most evil,
undemocratic facet of the entire system of government and law enforcement and
if affects everything else. Other examples of media cover ups include “cash for
comment” scandals, subliminal brainwashing and so on.
Information is power and the people have very little of either. That which you do
have is illusionary; a con foisted on you by their front men (presenters who smile
nicely and lie in your face through the mass media).
· Satellite surveillance, mind reading and neurophone technologies, coupled with
media/corporate/political/corporate cooperation, allow for numerous deceptions
which generate money/control. These include supernatural/psychic phenomena,
“alien” encounters and the growing community belief that such things are real.
The experiences are real but not the explanations. Despite the fact that some are
conmen most victims are either dupes or targets of illegal experimentation. And
while the cryptic/unreal references to the relevant technologies are numerous
(films, songs, books, TV) nowhere is it spelt out clearly that government agencies
and organised crime (Illuminati/Mafia) connections can and will rape minds,
transmit voices, physically harm using lasers etc etc. In other words… Because of
these technologies those experiencing certain psychic/alien/religious/paranormal
phenomena should seriously question their assessments.
· Most published writers use unpublished writers’ works which have been
submitted but discarded. They steal ideas, characters and more. So, just as you
can’t believe anything you read from well known people you can’t disbelieve
anecdotes to the contrary from silenced, nameless people because this is where
most material is actually sourced.
· TV/radio call ins, interviews, comments, statistics and so on are often stagemanaged;
i.e. set up. Also the opinions given on air are often not those of the
celebrity in question but the ones they’re told to go with. This is made easier
because only like-minded or corruptible people are hired by media outlets to start
with. The majority views of the general public are thereby
suppressed/underrepresented and then, via a constant bombardment of the
minority views that are aired, these majority views are gradually changed to suit
the control freaks behind it all; i.e. those that dictate to us with smiles and hoopla.
By the way, it’s not surprising that talented public figures should participate in
all of this especially since talent brings adulation which bestows power which is
corruptible. All too often it’s about keeping the public calm and quiet. Even
where the issue at hand rates vigorous comment or questioning of the authorities
the media take a softened approach because of the corrupt connections behind the
stage managed coverage. Simply put, they don’t want to stir people up to the
point where they really care.
· While wars are fought over oil and other natural resources, information on
frictionless engines and 1,000 other inventions has been suppressed because they
negate the need for dwindling resources and would create a shift in infrastructures
and power bases. Many other inventions that are not stopped are instead
controlled tightly by the government which places secrecy orders on any
development deemed to be of military value. In fact technologies exist which can
remotely do anything from trigger an animal attack to popping the planet like a
balloon. Man has been allowed to become more and more God-like in his
abilities which may explain why so many in positions of power have
megalomaniacal belief systems to rationalise their actions.
· Many diseases are created/invented and the cures to many others are suppressed.
One reason for this is to allow human culling another is because there’s more
money (for doctors and corrupt, heartless pharmaceutical companies) in treatment
than cure.
· The risks of many things are underplayed (deliberately) by the media to keep a
check on public reactions. Examples include the health risks associated with our
industrialised, pre packaged environment and activities. Even the dangers of
things like swimming are understated e.g. unless there’s evidence fatal encounters
with sharks are listed as drownings even if there are witnesses.
· Martial law (absolute control of communications, travel, banking, wages, prices,
assets etc) can be falsely triggered by a manufactured crisis. Terrorist attacks,
widespread rioting, natural disasters, financial crises etc could all be arranged
whenever deemed necessary (with ulterior motives).
Please note that any repetition here is to positively reinforce the message; there is
far too much going on in the world today that people are not told about. And sadly
people, especially in the affluent western democracies, are brainwashed/lulled into not
questioning or caring thus allowing these cover ups to continue.
Many desperate, sometimes puerile arguments are offered by wealthy criminals in
order to defend against the legitimate, sincere criticisms of genuinely concerned members
of the general public. Their stock standard phrases include “You’re mad”, “You’re
jealous” and so on but there are others, more sophisticated and better thought out. One of
these is “prejudice” (for a minority situation) the other is the general notion of “political
incorrectness” which, more times than not, is just a distraction or cover for moral/legal
Aside from nonsense about terminology (hey why say manager when you can say
womanager anyway hmm) part of the thinking behind “political correctness” is that in the
same way that the national flag can be the last recourse of the scoundrel, any association
with particular groups can be a way of certain criminals evading criticism or being
singled out. By connecting themselves to a religious, cultural, ethnic, political or sexual
minority “Prejudice” can be the defense to all accusations of wrongdoing in an attempt to
shift guilt and deflect blame. So where even individual or “mateship” defences are
inadequate “minority status” works most of the time especially if the accuser is, in some
way, actually biased. In all cases labeling criticism as “prejudicially derogative”, by
playing on simple semantics, phraseology and contextual misunderstanding, is the ploy.
By doing this most people are opened up to false accusations of bigotry and the criminal
has a general defence.
My argument is that people should speak plainly, not cryptically or
euphemistically. Being tied to politically correct nonsense is a form of precious
censorship. It’s a matter of simple, effective communication being restricted to reduce the
incidence of feigned offence. How would it be if we got to the stage where even doctors,
talking amongst themselves, said something ambiguous like “He’s got “men”? Does he
have meningitis, meningococcal disease, or meniers disease? Is he mentally challenged
or gay? No? It could be slang for “he has support”. Clearly such talk can create
unnecessary confusion.
The simple fact is that we are all different but with similarities that are more
obvious with reference to particular groups or our association with them. Now,
especially with respect to criminal activity, we should have no problem identifying
individuals or core groups of offenders by their recognizable titles. If, for example, you
have a group of Middle Eastern youths who are gang raping Anglo-Saxon women (itself
done out of a lack of respect and real prejudice) say so. Why should we allow
“prejudice” to be used in their defence? Equally, but less seriously, if the members of a
religious, sexual, ethnic or individual group (be it a minority or not) are hiring their own
people exclusively (or even preferably) they are guilty of real prejudice that restricts
opportunity for others and that also needs to be addressed. Again, often those who are
the quickest to cry “racist”, “sexist”, “Nazi” etc are really that way themselves but are
trying to silence others who are not biased just angry and indignant about the inequities
and crimes for which certain members of the group are responsible. Generalisations are
to be expected but you cannot solve any problem by limiting discussion of any aspect of
it. Silly terminology restrictions and more do just that. They stifle genuine
dialogue/writings on important matters and force us all to skirt around the truth.
Simply put, it isn’t discriminatory to question criminal conduct. Democratic
rights do not extend to the right to mistreat others. No one suggests vilifying every litter
bug or parking offender so the bulk of society’s resources (especially in law enforcement)
need to be directed at serious offenders regardless of who they are or what they hide
behind. Nevertheless, it appears that serious criminals (especially in high places) would
rather target the misdemeanors (or even personalities) of their accusers in order to silence
As for those who are victims of crime etc, it’s only natural that anyone victimized
by members of a particular group will be upset with them. You cannot expect targets to
respectfully name each offender if the group is predominantly from a particular race,
creed, occupation etc. Real prejudice is hating people because they are who or what they
are as ordinary, law-abiding citizens not merely identifying offenders by the correct
description that quickly and simply points them out.
To elaborate on this thinking, you also can’t really blame every member of a
particular group of people when it’s clear that the majority have a different attitude to the
offenders from that group. But equally you shouldn’t go into denial about wellestablished
events involving offenders from a group to which you belong just to protect
yourself from labeling. That’s tantamount to protecting criminals and fostering criminal
behaviour; again via censorship. For example, certain Muslim extremists believe that
Allah will reward them for carrying out suicide bombings against their enemies. The
average Muslim is appalled by such a notion but they shouldn’t deny it happens. Also
the average Jew is just as horrified by the Jewish persecution of the early Christians
(including the role of some Jews in Christ’s death) as he or she is by the persecution of
their own people during the holocaust of WW11. However, this doesn’t mean that either
set of events should be denied or forgotten, lest they be repeated. Final example (to
prove I’m not biased), my own faith is based in Catholicism yet the Catholic church has
committed/concealed crimes including the Spanish Inquisition and their more recent
association with organised crime. The average Christian condemns such hypocrisy but
you cannot pretend it doesn’t happen. The only ones denying all of these things seem to
be the non-average culprits and their criminal associates. You can pin the blame for a
certain problem on Al Queda, Zionists, Jesuit spies, the man in the moon or any other
suspect but the emphasis should be on right and wrong as delineated by honest observers;
i.e. the “average” citizen.
Yet again, criminals must not be allowed to blur the line by clinging to their
membership of a particular group. It’s never the group that’s to blame but a criminal
element within it and those wolves must not be allowed to masquerade as sheep. And
while on that, it’s their lust for power and wealth, their ego(s) that generate conflict
between groups in the first place when harmony would reign without them…
I reiterate, criminals simply must not be allowed to hide behind their national
flags or anthems, their wealth of fame, their power or political affiliation, their family,
mates, culture, creed, race, sex, colour or anything else. And they must not succeed in
silencing critics with counteraccusations based on any of these things.
All the problems outlined here could be eliminated if there was real accountability
in politics, government and so on. Unfortunately even Federal police don’t have the
resources, training or power to stop wealthy criminals using high tech satellite
surveillance/harassment technologies. I’ve spoken with many helpful officers in the
relevant units but they are always powerless to assist (in any event), as “national
security” is thrown at them by the agencies as a blanket defence to their crimes against
humanity. Now this situation is arranged deliberately by the powers that be so it can be
said that the police have a responsibility in this area yet they have no means of carrying
out their duties. Similarly Ombudsman’s offices, Inspector generals offices, Internal
affairs units, Parliamentary committees even Royal commissions are all of limited
effectiveness and therefore of dubious real value. They’re often toothless tigers; there
more for show than anything else. What all of this means is that we have connected
individuals (“businessmen”, journalists, politicians etc) operating outside the law without
fear of challenge. That is not a democratic system or one worthy of respect. There
should be adequate means of making officials and others accountable to ensure that
corruption is limited. Instead we have phonies operating unfettered as community
leaders, some even hiding behind feigned interest in “causes”, whilst in reality they work
for and with those who actively persecute other people for really standing up for what is
right or genuinely backing vital causes.
There are international treaties, conventions and the like which outline our rights
as citizens and human beings. The Nuremberg code, The Geneva convention and The
Universal Declaration of Human Rights are amongst these. The latter lists our rights to
freedom of thought, speech, expression etc but although these rights live in the hearts and
minds of the average law-abiding citizen, the political prisoner and so on they do not
actually exist in reality. They are only there for show. So, when it comes to commentary
on entrenched criminal activity, inequitable systems or government/corporate
brainwashing there is no real protection. The powers that be (including their hypocritical
front men who publicly ratify such treaties/conventions) only use their fine words as
some sort of grand cover, to be trotted out to counter accusations that they’re stifling free
speech or hiding the ugly truth.
For example, in western democracies political leaders sombrely refer to the
atrocities committed by governments that thumb their noses at UN requests. They
proudly boast that such things couldn’t happen in their lands but they do. The difference
is that in the west covert undetectable methods are used (spies, high tech, the media mafia
etc) and the media fails to report this. Consequently, victims not only have to deal with
oppression but discreditation because society, in general, is brainwashed into believing
that such things don’t happen. And even if they did know most people, these days, are
too apathetic to care unless it directly affects them.
Further, public figures are trusted and therefore are used to dull public
perceptions. This effectively means that fewer people need to be oppressed; only those
seeing behind the insincere words, the false smiles, and the celebrity hoo ha. These few
then try to exercise their real democratic rights only to discover that such rights don’t
really exist. With Big Brother surveillance covering all telecommunications, as well as
the conversations/actions of persons of interest and the thoughts of many anything except
total subservient, ignorant acceptance of our systems and their representatives (lies and
all) will lead to the sort of covert, criminal harassment I’ve been outlining. And there’s
no protection from that at all.
Just on real protection… The European Parliament and The UN have called for
bans on all weapons for human manipulation; effectively exposing the procedures I’ve
referred to (see and the EP resolution A4-0005/99, 28/1/99). However,
because the media is part of the overall conspiracy of silence on the methods used (the
media itself actively harassing targets with surveillance feedback etc) the public remains
largely unaware of the problem and, consequently, are also unaware of any of the
important matters which the victims wish to highlight. Yet without public demands
there’ll be no change. So… the heart of the problem, as I see it, is the central control of
the mainstream media by organised crime figures and spies who work for the
political/military/corporate conglomerate (which is the Godfather that Big Brother
answers to).
Again, anyone openly expressing views contrary to those foisted on the public by
the ruling conglomerate is targeted. People of integrity, advocates of truth, peace, equity,
justice, humanity and so on are attacked for even questioning obvious wrong doings. It’s
a process of “ethic cleansing” which some have termed “the silent holocaust”. The
challenging of the U.S. governments selective “world police” role is an example. If you
so much as suspect that the U.S. may foster trouble in oil rich states to justify interference
(whilst ignoring the plight of refugees etc in war torn third world countries, which have
nothing to offer) and you say/write as much you will be oppressed by those same
criminals. Similarly, if you argue that the ruling conglomerate fosters the drug trade or
1,000 other things, you will be oppressed for it.
Simply put, spies and criminals access advanced weapons to target those
questioning high level criminal activity. They pretend the targets are somehow deserving
of such treatment and use the cover of “National Security” to prevent intervention or
discussion of their corrupt, criminal conduct. Complaints about such covert
torture/harassment are then dismissed as paranoia (clearly all participating in such
cowardly procedures belong in jail).
Now, some of the methods used to silence those who know too much and protest
include the following:
· The infliction of pain, injury or death courtesy of directed energy weapons
positioned (mainly) in space.
· The delivery of neurophone technology, (voices, noise, hallucinations etc)
courtesy of psychotronic weapons positioned (mainly) in space.
· The monitoring and feedback of thoughts using state of the art
computers/software which is linked (via satellite) to the brain waves of scanned
targets. The individual bio electronic resonance frequency of each brain allows
identification and the latest tracking/location technology sets it all up, again, via
· The media feedback of illegally obtained satellite surveillance results including
the words, actions, thoughts and more (taken out on context) from the victims.
These results are often deliberately misinterpreted to annoy the targets. This is all
done via computer/agency transfer to the media.
· The on-the-ground harassment of victims using agency operatives, PI’s, corrupt
emergency services personnel, pilots etc.
Now, all of these are “black” operations partially funded by the same criminals
who have their enemies placed in these programs and they expect a return (information,
ideas etc) as well as the satisfaction of destroying their critics.
Humiliation, torture, scorn, marginalization and more beset the targets, often for the
remainder of their lives. In effect they’re not real threats but nuisances; nonetheless
they’re convenient guinea pigs for a policy of experimenting in human remote control. In
other words; the powers that be do not kill most of the victims outright. Instead high tech
computers facilitate surveillance, harassment and so on.
Now, fear, greed, apathy, ignorance, complicity and more prevent public figures
from intervening. If they did they could have their careers/lives terminated. Once again,
I ask you to think about the public figures who were truly worthy of some respect who’ve
met untimely ends due to assassinations, accidents and supposed suicides and you’ll see a
pattern. They all challenged the media mafia or the war mongers or the conglomerates
profiteers etc and so paid the price. Very bluntly stated we do not live in a democracy
only a quasi democracy. And our real rights are attacked/diminished every time
oppressive laws are passed or restrictions are placed on our freedom of expression,
association etc. Terrorism, political correctness, fear mongering and so on can facilitate
such things as: detention without representation; conviction without notification;
compulsory participation (voting, jury duty, military service); fines/bans for fairly
criticizing officials/systems; unaccountable agency operations involving torture, framing
and covert experimentation; draconian/restrictive deformation laws to silence powerful
critics etc etc. All of these things are undemocratic and wrong yet that assessment itself
also cannot be discussed publicly. We may only hear the justifications not the
challenges. Yet censorship of any part of the truth (or honest discussion of what is the
truth) is undemocratic.
The most obvious solution appears the most unlikely and that’s to engender
honesty, integrity and good character into our youth so that those attaining positions of
authority/power will not abuse it or us.
Regardless, belligerent resistance is required. We must persist in trying to expose the
methods used to conceal important facts. The biggest frustration is the realization that
without the cooperation of corruptible people in positions of authority/influence we
cannot succeed. Our democratic/human rights are in jeopardy both individually and as a
society but few people realise this. The UN and European Parliament can talk all they
like but if no one reports it…
Again, and sadly, I’ve no doubt that the day will come when satellite brain wave
scanning leads to the situation where all effective challenges to criminals in high places
will be stymied at the source before we even verbalise or write about it. People will
become conditioned to acceptance and neutralisation with every perceivable tactic being
known to the criminal elite ahead of time. It seems to me that one day a lack of
intelligence, integrity and intestinal fortitude will prevent most from even recognising the
problems I’m referring to let alone solving them.
This could be fought if, at the schooling level the tendency to suppress views (to
stifle truly free thinking) was eliminated in the interests of democracy and fair progress.
Such a “revolution” would force a freeing up of previously suppressed information
because people would then “demand to know” instead of being “happy to accept”
whatever they’re told. Sadly the ruling conglomerates brainwashing of our youth is
thorough and utterly controlling. Students just regurgitate what they’re told without
question, or their life prospects are greatly diminished. Still, it’s not so much what is
taught as it is what is not taught: ethics, corruption control, alternate solutions/theories
An example of the brainwashing at play is the notion that non-western, nondemocratic
countries are the only ones who indoctrinate the population and incarcerate
dissidents (free thinkers usually) while in the west we enjoy total freedom of (peaceful)
expression. Yet as you now know (if you didn’t already) the treatment of those who
question the evil that is hidden behind the ruling conglomerates facades is as brutal as
any it’s just all done in secret. Still if the good people of the planet knew this the world
would be a much better place because the weight of public opinion would force change.
And this is the value of persisting with our efforts to raise awareness even though it
seems our attempts just create a ripple in a big pond. Another hope is that those of us
working to expose the truth may inspire others who may one day get through to the
public figures who facilitate all of this and bring about a change of heart…
A huge obstacle to this is the control of certain professions (politics, publishing,
journalism, psychiatry etc) through agencies and organised crime syndicates. This leads
to the public brainwashing. In fact the term “brainwashing” was itself introduced by a
CIA spy, Ed Hunter, working as a journalist. Similarly the term “paranoid
schizophrenia” was introduced by CIA psychiatrists. So, the agencies and the mafia (etc)
plant people in key positions and recruit more from within the key professions. This is
why it’s difficult to locate any genuine people in public life and when you do they’re
afraid of being targeted just for retaining a little integrity/humanity; they’re surrounded
by spies/criminals. Acceptance of such a harsh truth is itself contrary to the brainwashed
mindset we’ve been given. “Spies and gangsters only torment each other” is the
conventional media reinforced thinking but that’s simply not true. They’re everywhere.
They stage-manage world events and our perception of them. This is what they do for a
CONCLUSION: Today censorship has become a twisting, controlling factor in how we
view the world we live in. It seems it’s acceptable to publicly promote many
pornographic, profane, blasphemous, violent, irresponsible entertainments (and activities)
yet it’s clearly unacceptable (to the powers that be) to discuss the ugly truth about the
hidden evils of this world. So, the defining factor is not whether it’s right or wrong but
whether it generates money. There’s money in sex, drugs, war, fraud, illegal experiments
and so on therefore they’re alright; “they” promote what they want and hide the rest.
However, what you don’t know really does hurt you.
Also “we can therefore we do” seems to be the prevailing philosophy. There’s
little real regard for morality or ethics or how it affects other people. It’s all about money
and control. Integrity and justice are replaced by self delusion and public deception and
most public figures willingly participate. It’s a tragic state of affairs but ignoring it won’t
So, in our quasi democratic system not only does the real truth not get a mention
but bans, lies, torture and more prevent concerned citizens from even presenting the truth
in any but the most marginalized fashion (such as in this magazine). It’s as if false labels
are placed on the most vital pieces of information about technology, public
accountability/integrity and more. Lies are labeled truth (and vice versa) and tyranny is
labeled freedom etc while they tell us (deceptively) “Hear what we say, see how we act,
think as we do, be as we are” (or else). Those of us who see through this nonsense must
endure harassment that tests our resolve, our courage and our endurance whilst they gloat
over every pain, every reaction and more. Simply put the tyrant loves his money and so
treats God (and his people) with disdain. Little wonder that those opposing evil in this
world are put through a great persecution courtesy of those running certain government
“black operations”, funded by criminals and their illegal practices (drugs etc) and hidden
by those same criminals, their media connections and government secrecy provisions.
What’s needed is peaceful, genuine protest and an increased public awareness of
the problems at hand, in particular the methods used to suppress information through the
oppression of individuals who have some sort of insight. And I’m not talking about
intelligence but integrity/truth. If there was nothing wrong the powers that be would
discuss all matters/technologies publicly but they can’t/won’t do that because there’d be a
public outcry against their crimes and they’d have to stop. They’d rather keep us in a
dream state looking at the world the way they want us to.
In keeping with my own beliefs regarding integrity, sincerity and loyalty I offer
the following quotes for your consideration...
1. “You can chain me, you can torture me, you can destroy this body, but you will
never imprison my mind” – Mahatma Gandhi
2. “The world is a dangerous place to live; not because of the people who are evil,
but because of the people who don’t do anything about it” – Albert Einstein
3. “Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter” –
Martin Luther King
4. “Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God” – Thomas Jefferson.
Perhaps those who also love peace, truth and their fellow man yet just stand by and
watch the world go by would do well to think on such quotes. There are still many good
men and women around us who share our ethics and beliefs. The only hope for our real
democratic rights is for everyone to be fully informed maybe then true democracy can be
resurrected along with the truths which the powers that be so corruptly bury. Having
been mushroomed and dumbed down we must push aside the pride, arrogance and lazy
thinking that can block out this truth even when we hear it. Again, on vital matters we
must both want the truth and demand it whether it’s comfortable and convenient for us or
not. Also while the truth never changes our perception of it can change if we’re not given
all the facts and again what we don’t know can hurt us. Only respect for the dignity of
the individual can save us from the worst that the oppressors can deliver. If we don’t act
now it will be farewell to many of our basic human rights: the right to free speech, the
right to personal privacy, even the right to freedom of thought/expression. In fact…
R.I.P. democracy itself.

No comments: